2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.04.088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical approach to transferring linear gradient elution methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4); note that the gradient time was simultaneously adjusted to hold the gradient slope constant to avoid changing selectivity [53,54]. We were rather surprised to see that compared to 1 mL/min, the higher flow rates gave better retention time repeatability (< 0.002 min) for the intermediately to highly retained solutes regardless of their retention volume (see Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Flow Rate On Repeatability-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4); note that the gradient time was simultaneously adjusted to hold the gradient slope constant to avoid changing selectivity [53,54]. We were rather surprised to see that compared to 1 mL/min, the higher flow rates gave better retention time repeatability (< 0.002 min) for the intermediately to highly retained solutes regardless of their retention volume (see Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Flow Rate On Repeatability-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both techniques provide reproducible retention times. However, optimization with a gradient should include the dwell volume of the instrument [16]. From the literature, gradients with ternary mixture of solvents are not very popular and chemometric approaches to such gradients have not yet been reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5A), two solutions were investigated to obtain highly efficient separation for confirmatory analyses: (1) one single 150 mm column generating about 35,000 plates at a flow rate of 300 L/min and (2) two 150 mm columns coupled in series providing 70,000 plates at a lower flow rate (200 L/min). Because the same stationary phase chemistry was available, a strict geometrical transfer, avoiding changes in selectivity was performed using the basic rules for method transfer [40,45,46]. Gradient profile conditions were obtained taking into account the change in column geometry using a freely usable Excel available on internal website [47].…”
Section: Transfer Of the High-throughput Gradient To Highly Efficientmentioning
confidence: 99%