2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.11.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical guide to robust detection of GABA in human brain by J-difference spectroscopy at 3 T using a standard volume coil

Abstract: Abstractγ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in human brain and has been implicated in several neuropsychiatric disorders. In-vivo human brain GABA concentrations are near the detection limit for magnetic resonance spectroscopy (∼1 mM) and because of overlap with more abundant compounds, spectral editing is generally necessary to detect GABA. In previous reports, GABA spectra edited by J-difference spectroscopy vary considerably in appearance. We have evaluated the factors that a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
136
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
136
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No attempts were made to correct for possible coedited macromolecular resonances, and as such, we henceforth refer to the GABA signals as GABA + . Although some have argued for using the creatine resonance as a frequency reference (Waddell, Avison, Joers, & Gore, 2007), we found the internal water referencing used here worked well for this purpose.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No attempts were made to correct for possible coedited macromolecular resonances, and as such, we henceforth refer to the GABA signals as GABA + . Although some have argued for using the creatine resonance as a frequency reference (Waddell, Avison, Joers, & Gore, 2007), we found the internal water referencing used here worked well for this purpose.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…We assumed Gaussian line shapes, with frequency, line width, and amplitude as the fitted parameters. Because the “true” line shape of the edited GABA + has been characterized as a “pseudo doublet” (Waddell et al, 2007) with fine structure from three lines we fit GABA + signals at ~3.02 ppm in the spectrum using three Gaussians. Mullins et al (2012) recommend using a single Gaussian for these fits; however, we have found that the three Gaussian approach results in lower chi-square values and better fits visually.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A disadvantage of this approach, as with all editing methods, is its reliance upon the subtraction of signals to remove strong overlapping frequencies from the spectrum in order to reveal GABA (Puts and Edden, 2012). This subtraction approach can be sensitive to any experimental noise such as subject movement or instrumental factors, which can then obscure the edited GABA signal (Waddell et al, 2007). Furthermore, some protein-containing macromolecules (Behar et al, 1994) resonate at a frequency coupled to a resonance near the GABA peak.…”
Section: Mrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For diagnostic and localization purposes, T1-weighted anatomical MRI (magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo [MPRAGE] sequence) was collected; 1 H MRS data were acquired using the single voxel point-resolved spectroscopy sequence (PRESS) (TE, 28 msec; TR, 2000 msec; 128 averages; voxel, 20 mm · 20 mm · 20 mm) to quantify brain glutamate and Mescher-Garwood point-resolved spectroscopy sequence (MEGA-PRESS) (TE, 68 msec; TR, 2000 msec; 16 averages · 20 dynamic scans; voxel, 30 mm · 30 mm · 20 mm) to quantify brain GABA (Mescher et al 1998;Waddell et al 2007). Voxels were placed in the ACC by a trained spectroscopist (E.M.S.)…”
Section: Neuroimaging Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%