2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13677-021-00271-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A price-aware congestion control protocol for cloud services

Abstract: In current infrastructure-as-a service (IaaS) cloud services, customers are charged for the usage of computing/storage resources only, but not the network resource. The difficulty lies in the fact that it is nontrivial to allocate network resource to individual customers effectively, especially for short-lived flows, in terms of both performance and cost, due to highly dynamic environments by flows generated by all customers. To tackle this challenge, in this paper, we propose an end-to-end Price-Aware Congest… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CC has been a crucial research topic since 1988 [13], and numerous CCs in Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) have been proposed: the window-based CC like TCP-Vega [14], TCP-Cubic [15], and Copa [16] adapt the window size derived from the congestion metrics; the rate-based CC like PCC [17], TCP-BBR [18] adjust the transmission rate for fast re-synchronization to reduce frame delay. Recently, CC in TCP specialized for cloud services has been proposed [19] [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CC has been a crucial research topic since 1988 [13], and numerous CCs in Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) have been proposed: the window-based CC like TCP-Vega [14], TCP-Cubic [15], and Copa [16] adapt the window size derived from the congestion metrics; the rate-based CC like PCC [17], TCP-BBR [18] adjust the transmission rate for fast re-synchronization to reduce frame delay. Recently, CC in TCP specialized for cloud services has been proposed [19] [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We utilize Jain's fairness [23], measured instantaneously at each 100ms interval, to evaluate fairness. For all cases, Table 1 presents link utilization, QD percentile 95 % and 99 %, TDQ (20), TDQ(55), TDQ(145), and Jain's fairness index on average of two traffics on IETF pattern. GCC performs to achieve fair distribution, with Jain's fairness values ranging from 0.97 to 0.98, similar to those of cL4S and sL4S.…”
Section: B Intra-protocol Fairnessmentioning
confidence: 99%