1977
DOI: 10.1080/15287397709529484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective on covalent binding and toxicity

Abstract: In this paper are discussed (1) the three general mechanisms by which radioisotopes may be retained in animal tissues long after labeled drugs are administered, (2) ways of differentiating these mechanisms, and (3) possible relationships between the toxic effects of drugs and their metabolism. It is emphasized, however, that studies on the disposition of drugs should be coordinated with toxicity studies in order to make the results of bioavailability and pharmacokinetic studies more meaningful in setting limit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the experimental adverse effects of DBCP, a correlation between necrotic inci-dence4) and protein alkylation or covalent binding of xenobiotics with proteins has been well elucidated in this decade. 12,27) In regard to the dominant lethality8)9) and chromosomal abberation, 35) G. A. Sega and J. G. Owens has recently deduced an interesting conclusion from their work on molecular dosimetry of ethyl methanesulfonate (a well known alkylating agent, EMS) in mice germ cells.16) They proposed a model that ethylation of cysteine sulfhydryl groups contained in mouse-sperm protamine could block normal disulfide-bond formation, preventing proper chromatin condensation in the sperm nucleus. Stresses in the chromatin structure could then eventually lead to chromosome breakage, with resultant dominant lethality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the experimental adverse effects of DBCP, a correlation between necrotic inci-dence4) and protein alkylation or covalent binding of xenobiotics with proteins has been well elucidated in this decade. 12,27) In regard to the dominant lethality8)9) and chromosomal abberation, 35) G. A. Sega and J. G. Owens has recently deduced an interesting conclusion from their work on molecular dosimetry of ethyl methanesulfonate (a well known alkylating agent, EMS) in mice germ cells.16) They proposed a model that ethylation of cysteine sulfhydryl groups contained in mouse-sperm protamine could block normal disulfide-bond formation, preventing proper chromatin condensation in the sperm nucleus. Stresses in the chromatin structure could then eventually lead to chromosome breakage, with resultant dominant lethality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Gillette has pointed out (Gillette and Pohl 1977), the toxic response is not an inevitable consequence of the formation of covalent associations, but an analysis of such complexes does provide a better understanding of the toxic impact of many drugs. Therefore, evidence of covalent binding of a veterinary drug or of its metabolites with endogenous macromolecules must be taken into account in order to check the toxicity of the substance on target species and to evaluate its potential carcinogenicity.…”
Section: Toxicological Significancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Les techniques suivantes, décrites par GUILLETTE et PHOL [8] et admises par d'autres chercheurs, sont applicables pour déterminer si un résidu est en effet lié. On considère qu'un résidu n'est pas lié si on peut_ obtenir la moitié du médicament en appliquant un des points suivants :…”
Section: Les Residus Et Leur Caracterisationunclassified