2015
DOI: 10.1080/07370024.2015.1093422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quantified Past: Toward Design for Remembering With Personal Informatics

Abstract: Authors' Mini-bios:Chris Elsden (c.r.elsden@ncl.ac.uk, http://di.ncl.ac.uk) is an interaction design researcher with an interest in memory-related technologies and the experience-centred design of personal informatics; he is a Ph.D student at Open Lab in the School of Computer Science at Newcastle University. David S. Kirk (david.kirk@ncl.ac.uk) is a psychologist with an interest in the human-centred design of memory-related technologies; he is a Reader in Cultural Computing at Open Lab in the School of Comput… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
99
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
5
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When asked to look at the extracts of food diaries our participants often did engage in 'data-work' (Elsden et al, 2015), i.e., they explained their food choices and described the background for their choices. However, as the quotes show, looking back at their past data was not something they normally did.…”
Section: Prospective Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When asked to look at the extracts of food diaries our participants often did engage in 'data-work' (Elsden et al, 2015), i.e., they explained their food choices and described the background for their choices. However, as the quotes show, looking back at their past data was not something they normally did.…”
Section: Prospective Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to this idea as the self-improvement hypothesis of PI. Although there are exceptions (notably life-logging and other recollection-and selfdocumentation-focused approaches, e.g., Elsden & Kirk, 2014), the self-improvement hypothesis seems to represent the dominant way of thinking about PI and the prevailing intention in designing such systems (see, e.g., Epstein, Ping, Fogarty, & Munson, 2015 ;Li, Dey, & Forlizzi, 2010), as well as the most common reason for users to adopt such systems (Choe, Lee, Lee, Pratt, & Kientz, 2014;Epstein et al, 2015;Li et al, 2010;Whooley, Ploderer, & Gray, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critically, this means working through the implications of PI, beyond their immediate utility -be it behaviour change, health or energy monitoring. For example, recent work questions the future uses of historical quantitative data as personal heritage [1,2]. Beyond HCI, sociologists have raised concerns for the potentially exploitative or coercive use of PI [10].…”
Section: Workhop Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As personal informatics tools become embedded and networked, and personal circumstances change, what alternative trajectories of data could design support, beyond Li et al's [5] five-stage model? Elsden et al [2] question how quantitative PI data mediates remembering of the past, while Dong et al [1] consider the fate of data from a Nest thermostat for something as enduring as a house. Can personal informatics data gradually become part of a meaningful biography?…”
Section: ) Designing For Dynamic Trajectories Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%