1992
DOI: 10.1016/0046-8177(92)90265-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative approach to the classification of hypospermatogenesis in testicular biopsies for infertility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
9
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in disturbed spermatogenesis, germ cells in the first meiotic prophase can show swollen or disorganized chromatin (Holstein et al, 1988 (Nistal and Paniagua, 1984;Holstein et al, 1988). In another study, there was no difference in the total number of germ cells between right and left testicular biopsies (Guarch et al, 1992). Such differences between studies confirm the importance of quantitative evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, in disturbed spermatogenesis, germ cells in the first meiotic prophase can show swollen or disorganized chromatin (Holstein et al, 1988 (Nistal and Paniagua, 1984;Holstein et al, 1988). In another study, there was no difference in the total number of germ cells between right and left testicular biopsies (Guarch et al, 1992). Such differences between studies confirm the importance of quantitative evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…In the testicular biopsy series studied, the 4D4 labelling revealed that maturation arrest could occur at the level of either mid-pachytene primary spermatocytes or earlier as seen by the absence of 4D4 labelling in the excluded cases. In addition, as some cells escape the blockage, maturation arrest has been considered as a type of hypospermatogenesis (Honoré, 1979), and its existence as a separate entity has been questioned (Guarch et al, 1992). However, in the study reported here, significant differences were found between these two disturbances of spermatogenesis, supporting the notion that these disorders must be of different origin (Nistal and Paniagua, 1984;Skakkebaek et al, 1989).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…A reduction in tubular diameter, thickening of the tubular wall and increase in Leydig‐cell density are common in severe germ‐cell impairment, although the distribution is irregular [9]. A thickening of the seminiferous tubule and blood vessel walls could be responsible for the limited functional capacity of Sertoli cells, causing altered spermatogenesis in cases of excretory azoospermia [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, although the pathophysiological role of the Ang II actions on TPMC remains to be elucidated, our data suggest that Ang II-induced TPMC growth might be, to some extent, responsible for the proliferation of those cells in human testicular disorders characterized by thickening of the tubular wall, such as varicocele (39), hypospermatogenesis (40), and cryptorchidism (41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%