2018
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa9da3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative performance assessment of improved cooking stoves and traditional three-stone-fire stoves using a two-pot test design in Chamwino, Dodoma, Tanzania

Abstract: A quantitative performance assessment of improved cooking stoves and traditional three-stone-fire stoves using a two-pot test design in Chamwino, Dodoma, Tanzania AbstractIn Tanzania, a majority of rural residents cook using firewood-based three-stone-fire stoves. In this study, quantitative performance differences between technologically advanced improved cooking stoves and three-stone-fire stoves are analysed.We test the performance of improved cooking stoves and three-stone-fire stoves using local cooks, f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the number of applied adaptation measures was not at all, or only insignificantly, reduced due to ICS usage in Idifu. Hafner et al (2018) show that the fuelwood savings of ICS in Idifu is between 15.6% and 37.1% compared to TSF. Hence, we would expect that the overall number of coping strategies in Idifu to be lower than in Mzula due to the reduced demand for fuelwood in Idifu.…”
Section: Preventive Versus Acute Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that the number of applied adaptation measures was not at all, or only insignificantly, reduced due to ICS usage in Idifu. Hafner et al (2018) show that the fuelwood savings of ICS in Idifu is between 15.6% and 37.1% compared to TSF. Hence, we would expect that the overall number of coping strategies in Idifu to be lower than in Mzula due to the reduced demand for fuelwood in Idifu.…”
Section: Preventive Versus Acute Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At the same time, farms steadily move into new areas, accelerating the clearing of forest land (Goulden et al 2009), leading to dilapidated forest and woodland areas (Mutabazi 2016). Idifu has approximately 1200 households (Hafner 2016), while Mzula has around 750 households (Mutabazi 2016). Most of the households are subsistence farmers.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that collecting biomass fuel to provide cooking energy for rural families is an unpaid burden, women in the rural areas of developing countries devote valuable time and effort at the expense of education and income generation, to this work [29,35]. This study however indicates that when this labour is quantified and monetarised, the positive impact of utilising improved cook stoves [30] on feedstock collection is evident in economic terms, in addition to their contribution in reducing carbon footprint [23,24] and health impacts.…”
Section: Energy Costs Per Meal Cooked In the Rural Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the cost of wood harvesting for charcoal production, we notice that the improved efficiency of the kiln and the charcoal stoves [23,24] directly translates into a positive economic impact [30] as considerably less wood is used for producing the same amount of charcoal [23,31].…”
Section: Energy Costs Per Meal Cooked In the Rural Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most households comprise subsistence farmers, who use fuelwood as their main energy source for cooking and boiling water in both villages. Idifu consists of approximately 1,200 households (Hafner, 2016) and Mzula has around 750 households (Mutabazi, 2016). Two different cooking technologies are used at the case study sites.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%