2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nme.2020.100819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative risk assessment methodology based on CCDF risk curve for accidental releases from fusion reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hong Y integrated a deterministic approach with fault tree analysis for reliability assessment of generation and transmission systems [11]. Wang Z proposed a risk assessment methodology on the basis of the accident characteristics for fusion reactors [12]. Wang D proposed the probabilistic safety goals with dose vs. frequency and assessed the accident consequence frequency for fusion reactors by applying PSA [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hong Y integrated a deterministic approach with fault tree analysis for reliability assessment of generation and transmission systems [11]. Wang Z proposed a risk assessment methodology on the basis of the accident characteristics for fusion reactors [12]. Wang D proposed the probabilistic safety goals with dose vs. frequency and assessed the accident consequence frequency for fusion reactors by applying PSA [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The safety of ITER (and of other nuclear fusion systems, like the European Demonstration Power Plant (EU DEMO)) needs to be verified and proved by a rigorous assessment of the system's response to operational transients and accidental conditions, and the related (safety) gaps and issues need to be underlined [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Actually, we must avoid the plant operators, the people, and the environment being contaminated by radioactive agents, e.g., tritium and other materials activated by the neutrons generated by the nuclear fusion reactions [12][13][14][15]. Additionally, the protection and integrity of the superconducting magnet system must be guaranteed, due to its huge cost [16], as well as due to the need to ensure at least a lifetime equal to that of the nuclear fusion plant itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%