Objectives
Among the challenges in conducting clinical trials in large-vessel vasculitis (LVV), including both giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu’s arteritis (TAK), is the lack of standardized and meaningful outcome measures. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Vasculitis Working Group initiated an international effort to develop and validate data-driven outcome tools for clinical investigation in LVV.
Methods
An international Delphi exercise was completed to gather opinions from clinical experts on LVV-related domains considered important to measure in trials. Patient interviews and focus groups were completed to identify outcomes of importance to patients. The results of these activities were presented and discussed in a “Virtual Special Interest Group” using telephone- and internet-based conferences, discussions via electronic mail, and an in-person session at the 2016 OMERACT meeting. A preliminary core set of domains common for all forms of LVV with disease-specific elements was proposed.
Results
The majority of experts agree with using common outcome measures for GCA and TAK, with the option of supplementation with disease-specific items. Following interviews and focus groups, pain, fatigue and emotional impact emerged as health-related quality of life domains important to patients. Current disease assessment tools, including the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score, were found to be inadequate to assess disease activity in GCA and standardized assessment of imaging tests were felt crucial to study LVV, especially TAK.
Conclusion
Initial data from a clinicians Delphi exercise and structured patients interviews have provided themes towards an OMERACT-endorsed core set of domains and outcome measures.