1991
DOI: 10.2307/422257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rational Choice Approach to Political Regionalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 See Gurr (2000); Gurr and Moore (1997);Horowitz (1985). 7 See Brustein (1988);Meadwell (1991). 8 Hechter (2001;1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 See Gurr (2000); Gurr and Moore (1997);Horowitz (1985). 7 See Brustein (1988);Meadwell (1991). 8 Hechter (2001;1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not exclude nonviolent demands or regionalist demands because that would amount to restricting the analysis on the basis of an assumption that they have different 13 See Meadwell (1991) and Bunce (1999) with reference to Yugoslavia. On elite incentives in regional parties and movements as they bargain over representation at the center, see Sorens (2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, detailed and exact predictions following from these discussions are surprisingly rare and generally under-specified. For example, both Newman (1996) and Meadwell (1991) point to the importance of majoritarian and consociational decision-making processes for an understanding of regional autonomy movements, but failed to provide clear hypotheses (see also Keating, 1998). For example, Newman (1996) merely states that '[t]he fate of specific ethnoregional movements emerges from the interactions among the sources of these ethnoregional conflicts and existing political institutions' (p. 4), without specifying the exact relation between types of institutions and the fate of movements.…”
Section: Political Factorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…7 Meadwell is an exception; in an apparently littlenoticed 1991 article, he distinguished between secessionists, who seek full political independence as their primary aim, and regionalists, who have a "mixed preference ordering," favoring regional autonomy over the status quo, but the status quo over independence. 8 Following Meadwell, we might say that over the three options, independence, autonomy, and the status quo, the following four "minority nationalist" preference orderings are possible:…”
Section: Downloaded By [Miami University Libraries] At 06:26 03 Octobmentioning
confidence: 99%