2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/657985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A RBFNN-Based Adaptive Disturbance Compensation Approach Applied to Magnetic Suspension Inertially Stabilized Platform

Abstract: Compared with traditional mechanical inertially stabilized platform (ISP), magnetic suspension ISP (MSISP) can absorb high frequency vibrations via a magnetic suspension bearing system with five degrees of freedom between azimuth and pitch gimbals. However, force acting between rotor and stator will introduce coupling torque to roll and pitch gimbals. Since the disturbance of magnetic bearings has strong nonlinearity, classic state feedback control algorithm cannot bring higher precision control for MSISP. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e angular displacement of each gimbal is the feedback signal to realize closed-loop control about attitude of three-axis ISP, and then the attitude stabilization precision of three gimbals would be kept at balanced state. Moreover, the function of compensation module of base coupling in the red dotted-line diagram of Figure 10 is to compensate the base coupling torques T b p in (15), T b r in (17), and T b y in (19). e angular rates of three gimbals and the base plate are used as the feedback signal to compute the compensation terms for minimizing the base coupling torques.…”
Section: Control Diagram Of Ree-axis Isp With the Amb Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e angular displacement of each gimbal is the feedback signal to realize closed-loop control about attitude of three-axis ISP, and then the attitude stabilization precision of three gimbals would be kept at balanced state. Moreover, the function of compensation module of base coupling in the red dotted-line diagram of Figure 10 is to compensate the base coupling torques T b p in (15), T b r in (17), and T b y in (19). e angular rates of three gimbals and the base plate are used as the feedback signal to compute the compensation terms for minimizing the base coupling torques.…”
Section: Control Diagram Of Ree-axis Isp With the Amb Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the disturbances could be transferred from the pitch and roll gimbals to the yaw gimbal such that the attitude stabilization precision of yaw gimbal is reduced [12][13][14]. erefore, in order to suppress the vibration acting on yaw gimbal, an active magnetic bearing (AMB) [15][16][17] system was designed for suspending the yaw gimbal in three-axis ISP. Since the AMB system provides a contactless suspension to yaw gimbal, the vibration disturbances from other gimbals could be effectively isolated, and the friction between levitated gimbal and suspension elements would be minimized [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the centralized POS, extra angular rate gyros are mounted on roll, pitch, and azimuth gimbals of the ISP system, respectively, to achieve feed forward control [9][10][11], such as Swiss Leica PAV80 and PVA100, in which the centralized POS is assembled inside the camera and additional piezoelectric gyros are located at three gimbals [12]. However, BUAA fixes the centralized POS on the shell of camera; meanwhile, the open-loop fiber optic gyros (or MEMS gyros) and quartz accelerometers are installed on each gimbal for rate feedback and initial leveling [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this method offers low control accuracy and robustness. A feedforward scheme for a two axis inertial stabilized platform (ISP) was adopted to reject the periodic disturbing torque acting on the payload due to the static mass unbalance [9,10], but the accelerometer signal may be easily distorted by the centripetal acceleration [11]. The H ∞ control method presents strong robustness, but it is highly conservative and the control accuracy is usually sacrificed [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%