2013
DOI: 10.1002/jgra.50598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reexamination of latitudinal limits of substorm‐produced energetic electron precipitation

Abstract: The primary sources of energetic electron precipitation (EEP) which affect altitudes <100 km (>30 keV) are expected to be from the radiation belts and during substorms. EEP from the radiation belts should be restricted to locations between L = 1.5 and 8, while substorm‐produced EEP is expected to range from L = 4 to 9.5 during quiet geomagnetic conditions. Therefore, one would not expect any significant D region impact due to electron precipitation at geomagnetic latitudes beyond about L = 10. In this study we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher A p levels correspond to greater geomagnetic disturbances, which are likely to involve multiple substorms. It has previously been shown that substorms lead to strong precipitation over a wide L shell range (Cresswell‐Moorcock et al, ), which would explain the EEP enhancement seen in Figure for those A p conditions.…”
Section: Reanalysis Of Poes/sem Electron Flux Measurementmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Higher A p levels correspond to greater geomagnetic disturbances, which are likely to involve multiple substorms. It has previously been shown that substorms lead to strong precipitation over a wide L shell range (Cresswell‐Moorcock et al, ), which would explain the EEP enhancement seen in Figure for those A p conditions.…”
Section: Reanalysis Of Poes/sem Electron Flux Measurementmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This time period spans an extended period of low solar activity, in which the trapped low Earth orbit relativistic electron fluxes reported by SAMPEX [ Russell et al ., ] and the geosynchronous GOES observations both fell to noise floor levels. Similar decreases in the POES‐trapped relativistic electrons have been reported, which were noted as being “unprecedented in the ~14 years of SEM‐2 observations” [ Cresswell‐Moorcock et al ., ]. In the same time period, that study noted the outer belt >100 keV POES‐trapped electron fluxes decreased by 1–1.5 orders of magnitude, recovering to the typical long‐term average in 2010.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This is undertaken for a series of MLT range: 0–3, 3–6, 6–9, through to 21–24 MLT. A more detailed description of the dataset and the processing undertaken can be found in Rodger, Clilverd, et al () and Cresswell‐Moorcock et al ().…”
Section: Experimental Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%