2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrospective study of using removable occlusal splint in the treatment of condylar fracture in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
35
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,8,11,16,17 One approach is splint therapy. 18,19 Two other approaches, differing in whether surgery is performed at the fracture site, are currently the treatments of choice. The conservative approach focuses on fixating the maxillomandibular relationship of the dental occlusion to place the fractured parts in a good relationship, leaving the fracture site untouched.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,8,11,16,17 One approach is splint therapy. 18,19 Two other approaches, differing in whether surgery is performed at the fracture site, are currently the treatments of choice. The conservative approach focuses on fixating the maxillomandibular relationship of the dental occlusion to place the fractured parts in a good relationship, leaving the fracture site untouched.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also reported that longer periods of IMF can lead to bony ankylosis or fibrosis and severely limited mouth opening. For children, the treatment of condylar fractures with IMF is complicated by poor patient compliance, difficulty in applying IMF, and, in the case of mixed dentition, lack of sufficient support [19]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The management of condylar fractures is still controversial. The treatment approach includes (A) surgical open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) [16, 17] or (B) closed functional therapeutic regimen (CTR) [18, 19]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been studies recently proving a well-tolerated removal splint therapy which enabled good occlusion in all the patients, along with unimpaired function and good development of the mandible in those patients. 18 In spite of the many advantages, the open reduction method of condylar process osteosynthesis has its limitation because it involves the risk of damaging crucial periarticular structures. In the above studies, a retromandibular incision was used in patients treated by open reduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%