The physical and even chemical properties of crystals often differ with crystal orientation, [1] due to the distinct atomic interactions and bond distances along the crystal directions, which can strongly affect the electronic, mechanical, and/or magnetic characteristics. Accordingly, the integration of crystals into devices requires control of their surface orientation. [2] Mesoscale self-assembly of particles into supercrystals is important for the design of functional materials such as photonic and plasmonic crystals. However, while much progress has been made in self-assembling supercrystals adopting diverse lattices and using different types of particles, controlling their growth orientation on surfaces has received limited success. Most of the latter orientation control has been achieved via templating methods in which lithographic processes are used to form a patterned surface that acts as a template for particle assembly. Herein, a template-free method to self-assemble (111)-, (100)-, and (110)-oriented face-centered cubic supercrystals of the metal-organic framework ZIF-8 particles by adjusting the amount of surfactant (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) used is described. It is shown that these supercrystals behave as photonic crystals whose properties depend on their growth orientation. This control on the orientation of the supercrystals dictates the orientation of the composing porous particles that might ultimately facilitate pore orientation on surfaces for designing membranes and sensors.
Mesoscale AssemblyFor instance, the importance of controlled growth of oriented crystalline (111)-silicon and (0001)-ZnO nanowires, [3,6] (001)-YBCO superconductors, [4] and phosphorene semiconductors [5] on surfaces in electronic, photovoltaic, and photonic devices has been described. To date, crystal orientation is controlled chiefly via direct growth methods, including vapor/ liquid/solid, [7] oxide-assisted, [8] and template-based growth methods. [9] Controlled orientation of crystals on surfaces can also improve the performance of porous materials integrated into devices or membranes. For example, Tsapatsis and coworkers demonstrated that zeolite ZSM-5 membranes in the (010) orientation perform better at separation of xylene isomers than those in other orientations do. They attributed this advantage to the larger, straighter pores accessible along the b-axis throughout the membrane thickness, compared to the narrower, sinusoidal pores along the a-axis. [10] Likewise, MFI-type zeolite membranes in the (010) orientation showed better separation performance and mass transfer than those in other orientations did. [11] Similar trends are expected for metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), an emerging class of porous materials that can be synthesized in various shapes and pore sizes and that show extremely large surface areas and tailored internal surfaces. [12,13] Preliminary advances in controlling the orientation of MOF crystal growth on surfaces have been reported by Biemmi et al., [14] for HKUST-1, and by Zacher et a...