2016
DOI: 10.5389/ksae.2016.58.4.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Baseflow Analysis Techniques of Watershed-Scale Runoff Models

Abstract: Streamflow is composed of baseflow and direct runoff. However, most of streamflow during dry seasons depends on baseflow. Thus, baseflow analysis is very important to simulate streamflow of dry seasons. Generally, baseflow analysis is conducted using watershed-scale runoff models due to diffilculty of measuring baseflow. However, it is needed to understand and review how the model simulates baseflow because each model uses inherent baseflow analysis techniques. In this study, SWAT, HSPF, PRMS-IV were reviewed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SWAT has the advantage of improving water quality and reducing pollution load by applying BMP on a field basis for each Hydrologic Response Unit (HRU), considering the steep slope and slope characteristics [41,42]. On the other hand, in the case of HSPF, it is difficult to consider soil characteristics, and applying BMP on a field basis is relatively more difficult than the SWAT, so it is not efficient in rural areas [43,44]. In the case of HSPF, various management studies are being widely conducted to improve water quality management due to the increase in impervious area ratio in urban areas during rainfall [45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Description Of Swat and Hspfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SWAT has the advantage of improving water quality and reducing pollution load by applying BMP on a field basis for each Hydrologic Response Unit (HRU), considering the steep slope and slope characteristics [41,42]. On the other hand, in the case of HSPF, it is difficult to consider soil characteristics, and applying BMP on a field basis is relatively more difficult than the SWAT, so it is not efficient in rural areas [43,44]. In the case of HSPF, various management studies are being widely conducted to improve water quality management due to the increase in impervious area ratio in urban areas during rainfall [45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Description Of Swat and Hspfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SWAT is a program developed by Dr. Jeff Arnold of the United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service (USDA ARS) for analyzing long-term hydrologic and water quality changes in large and complex watersheds with diverse soil properties and land uses [14]. The SWAT model is a semi-distributed long-term flow model that is more efficient as a dry season model compared with the Tank model and is more reliable than other semi-distributed models, such as the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS) model and the Hydrological Simulation Program-Fortran (HSPF) model [45,46]. Hence, this model was selected for this study as it has also been tested for its applicability to various areas in Korea and universal applicability to studies on surface flow, riverbed, lake, and underground water.…”
Section: Theoretical Background 21 Description Of Swatmentioning
confidence: 99%