1999
DOI: 10.5089/9781451847239.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Capital Account Restrictions in Chile in the 1990's

Abstract: This paper examines the Chilean experience with capital controls and reviews studies on controls on capital inflows. Controls on Chile's inflows had only a temporary impact in reducing specific inflows because they were affected by avoidance. There is some evidence that controls increased interest rates and altered the composition of capital inflows. The studies, however, contain important methodological problems in measuring flows and significant econometric weaknesses, which cast doubt on the robustness of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Around 1996, a substantial empirical literature began to emerge on the effectiveness of the Chilean URR. Although a review of the literature by Nadal‐De Simone and Sorsa () cautioned against prematurely accepting the Chilean experience as supportive of the effectiveness of such controls, most had interpreted the body of empirical evidence to believe that the URR had lengthened the maturity of capital inflows (if not reduced the total volume). Some studies are more supportive of the volume effect as well (Gallego et al ; Le Fort and Lehmann ), whereas others have found limited impact on the real exchange rate or the interest rate differential, especially in the short run (De Gregorio et al ; Herrera and Valdes ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around 1996, a substantial empirical literature began to emerge on the effectiveness of the Chilean URR. Although a review of the literature by Nadal‐De Simone and Sorsa () cautioned against prematurely accepting the Chilean experience as supportive of the effectiveness of such controls, most had interpreted the body of empirical evidence to believe that the URR had lengthened the maturity of capital inflows (if not reduced the total volume). Some studies are more supportive of the volume effect as well (Gallego et al ; Le Fort and Lehmann ), whereas others have found limited impact on the real exchange rate or the interest rate differential, especially in the short run (De Gregorio et al ; Herrera and Valdes ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simone and Sorsa (1999) is an excellent survey of the empirical literature on the Chilean capital controls.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%