2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.03.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of cellular automata models for crowd evacuation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, it is possible that other methods would yield higher performances, which would be explored through additional experiments. Similarly, experiments can be extended to CA models of other phenomena such as evacuation [40], city growth [7], or traffic dynamics [43]. Finally, our approach determines correct and incorrect simulations based on varying parameters of the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, it is possible that other methods would yield higher performances, which would be explored through additional experiments. Similarly, experiments can be extended to CA models of other phenomena such as evacuation [40], city growth [7], or traffic dynamics [43]. Finally, our approach determines correct and incorrect simulations based on varying parameters of the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As [23] points out when describing the key role of accidents between agents, the way a discrete model divides the space is a central problem. On the one hand, Dadová and Ferko [24] proposes a more relaxed space division to provide freedom of movement to agents, where cells size is 4 to 5 times larger than the necessary for an agent.…”
Section: Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Agent-Based Model (ABM), see [24,26], and CA models serve as examples of this group. For the detailed taxonomy of CA models see the overview in [20]. One of the most used CA model is the Floor Field Cellular Automata (FFCA) model, described in [5,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%