2019
DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2018.2836912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Features and Limitations of Existing Scalable Multiobjective Test Suites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There exist many multi-objective benchmark problems in the literature [57], but most of them do not concern the sparsity of Pareto optimal solutions. For example, the DTLZ test suite [58] In spite of some sparse MOPs in existing multiobjective test suites, most of them do not have a suitable hardness to study the performance of MOEAs for sparse MOPs.…”
Section: A Sparse Mops In Existing Test Suitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist many multi-objective benchmark problems in the literature [57], but most of them do not concern the sparsity of Pareto optimal solutions. For example, the DTLZ test suite [58] In spite of some sparse MOPs in existing multiobjective test suites, most of them do not have a suitable hardness to study the performance of MOEAs for sparse MOPs.…”
Section: A Sparse Mops In Existing Test Suitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,32] Independent parameters Parameters in each function that independently adjust the challenges presented to the DM regarding to the convergence and coverage. [11,19] No extremal or medial parameters Both are to prevent exploitation by truncation, based on correction operators in the case of extremal parameters and on intermediate recombination in the case of medial parameters. [14] Bias…”
Section: Modalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the constraints presented in Eqs. (19), (20) and (21), it is possible to select large regions in the objective space in the following way: consider a problem where the objective space is located in the first orthant of R M space. In this case, consider the angle θ i between the point y = F (x) and the vectors of the canonical basis e i = (0, .…”
Section: Equality and Inequality Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are two general methods to solve the multiobjective optimization problem: weight-based method and Pareto-based method [33][34][35]. From Theorems 9 and 10, we know that reducing the PPL and the VEF can improve the performance of GMDR and GMD under certain conditions.…”
Section: Fitness Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%