2020
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1490/1/012032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Panel Data on Spatial Econometrics Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the spatial effects, an overview of the panel data spatial econometric models can be found in Astuti et al (2020). Briefly, the Spatial Autoregressive Model (SAR) specifies the existence of spatial effects in the dependent variable, while the Spatial Error Model (SEM) specifies their existence in the error term.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the spatial effects, an overview of the panel data spatial econometric models can be found in Astuti et al (2020). Briefly, the Spatial Autoregressive Model (SAR) specifies the existence of spatial effects in the dependent variable, while the Spatial Error Model (SEM) specifies their existence in the error term.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) allows identifying spatial effects in the dependent variable as well as in the regressors. Thus, to ascertain the role of geographical location or spatial proximity throughout the whole production technology (i.e., output and inputs), the SDM (which nests both the SAR and SEM models) is the appropriate model (Astuti et al 2020;Haini 2020), with…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…resulted from statistical observations of the variables characteristic of a group of n regions periodically, for a defined time interval, T [31].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cohort study used state-level data on monthly aggregate cigarette sales volumes released for Massachusetts and its bordering states to obtain unbiased and consistent estimates. 3 The study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline. Because the study did not directly involve human participants, it did not require institutional review board approval or informed consent in accordance with the Common Rule.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a spatial lag regression model specification (eMethods in the Supplement) to compare temporal changes in cigarette sales in Massachusetts and its bordering states before (January 1, 2017, to May 31, 2020) and after (June 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021) the comprehensive flavor ban with changes in 40 states and the District of Columbia (DC) that did not implement local or statewide menthol flavor bans. The model allowed for spatial dependence in cigarette sales between Massachusetts and its bordering states to obtain unbiased and consistent estimates . The study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%