2005
DOI: 10.1080/15700760500244769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Transformational School Leadership Research 1996–2005

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
462
0
33

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 472 publications
(507 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
12
462
0
33
Order By: Relevance
“…While some change processes are prescribed and linear (Kotter, 1996), others are organic and unfolding (Hagstrom, 2004;Wheatley, 1992) and depend on developing a collaborative, trusting culture (Leithwood & Jantzi, 2007). Developing a collaborative and trusting relationship among participants during the change process was a critical part of our work.…”
Section: Guiding Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While some change processes are prescribed and linear (Kotter, 1996), others are organic and unfolding (Hagstrom, 2004;Wheatley, 1992) and depend on developing a collaborative, trusting culture (Leithwood & Jantzi, 2007). Developing a collaborative and trusting relationship among participants during the change process was a critical part of our work.…”
Section: Guiding Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engaging those impacted by decisions is empowering and liberating (Freire, 1997) and contributes to success in learning organizations (Leithwood & Jantzi, 2007). Because consensus is a strong strategy for increasing participant satisfaction with outcomes (Lambert, 1998), our university empowers faculty through shared governance.…”
Section: Guiding Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the face of these changes, the most appropriate leadership style for schools' restructuring initiatives is transformational leadership (Leithwood, 1992(Leithwood, , 1994 because this leadership style aims innovation in organizations, devotes authority to teachers and supports them (Marks & Printy, 2003). Leithwood, who adapted the transformational leadership models developed in out-of-school contexts to the school environment, determined transformational school leadership as six dimensions and ranked as following (Jantzi & Leithwood, 1996;Leithwood, 1994;Leithwood & Jantzi, 2005): (i) Determining and defining a vision: Defines, explains and develops new possibilities for the school and aims to inspire others with the vision of the future. (ii) Strengthening the acceptance of group objectives: It aims to develop cooperation between the members and to help working together to achieve the common goals.…”
Section: Individualized Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of seven quantitative studies he has take out following conclusion (Leithwood, 1994, p. 506): "Transformational leadership practices, considered as a composite construct, had significant direct and indirect effect on progress with school-restructuring initiatives and teacher-perceived student outcomes." Six dimensions to transformational school leadership are: 1) identifying and articulating a vision, 2) fostering the acceptance of group goals, 3) providing individualized support, 4) intellectual stimulation, 5) providing an appropriate model, and 6) high performance expectations (Leithwood, 1994;Geijsel, Sleegers & Van Den Berg, 1999;Jantzi & Leithwood, 1996;Leithwood & Jantzi, 2005).…”
Section: Transformational Leadership and Ethical Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%