2001
DOI: 10.1145/502800.502804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A revised simplex method with integer Q-matrices

Abstract: We describe a modification of the simplex formulas in which Q-matrices are used to implement exact computations with an integer multiprecision library. Our motivation comes from the need for efficient and exact incremental solvers in the implementation of constraint solving languages such as Prolog. We explain how to reformulate the problem and the different steps of the simplex algorithm. We compare some measurements obtained with integer and rational computations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pivoting is done by row operations on the system followed by a division by the old determinant, which always produces integers (see Avis 2000, Sect. 7 or Azulay andPique 2001). In that way, the dictionary entries are kept from growing indefinitely.…”
Section: S-intpivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pivoting is done by row operations on the system followed by a division by the old determinant, which always produces integers (see Avis 2000, Sect. 7 or Azulay andPique 2001). In that way, the dictionary entries are kept from growing indefinitely.…”
Section: S-intpivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the REF framework for solving dense SLEs is measured in relation to exact rational arithmetic LU factorization, which is a primary basic solution validation subroutine used in exact LP solvers (see Section 2.1). In addition, we devise and test an efficient adaptation of the Q-matrix revised simplex method (Azulay and Pique 2001), which is an alternative IPGE-based approach. The metrics of interest are threefold: (1) runtimes of the construction phases for each tool (i.e., calculating exact LU factorizations or adapted Q-matrices), (2) runtimes of the respective solution phases (i.e., performing exact forward and backward triangular solves or multiplying the adapted Q-matrix with the SLE RHS), and (3) storage requirements.…”
Section: Featured Computational Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each Q-matrix corresponds to the adjunct matrix of a basis and, like the REF factorizations, it is constructed via IPGE. Azulay and Pique (2001) expanded this tool by developing the Q-matrix revised simplex method, which was designed to operate as a full-fledged exact LP solver. In the limited accompanying set of experiments, their method decreased the respective exact rational arithmetic revised simplex runtimes by at most one order of magnitude-achieving a maximum speedup of 12 on 1 of 24 NETLIB instances.…”
Section: Storage the Second Experiments Performs A New Set Of Runs Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When dealing with black-box optimization problems, traditional mathematical programming methods such as the simplex algorithm [Dantzig and Thapa 1997] [Weglarz et al 1977] [Azulay and Pique 2001], and gradient-based methods such as the Quasi-Newton method [Zhu et al 1997] and the conjugate gradient method [Hager and Zhang 2006] are no longer applicable, since the internal information about the problem, such as the coefficients and derivative, is unavailable, or only partially available. In such a case, derivative-free algorithms are promising methods for solving black-box optimization problems as they take only the input and output of a function into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%