2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2016.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust similarity measure for volumetric image registration with outliers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All rigid intra-subject registrations were performed using Normalised Mutual Information (NMI) [ 67 ] with 64 histogram bins as similarity measure. The non-linear registrations of the age-specific T1 template to T1 subject sequences used a cosine similarity measure based on normalised gradient fields (cosNGF) [ 68 ], a transformation model based on B-spline free-form deformations [ 69 ], an image pyramid of 4 levels, bending energy (BE) as regularisation term, and 5 mm final control point spacing. The energy term weight distribution was set to 0.995 cosNGF +0.005 BE.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All rigid intra-subject registrations were performed using Normalised Mutual Information (NMI) [ 67 ] with 64 histogram bins as similarity measure. The non-linear registrations of the age-specific T1 template to T1 subject sequences used a cosine similarity measure based on normalised gradient fields (cosNGF) [ 68 ], a transformation model based on B-spline free-form deformations [ 69 ], an image pyramid of 4 levels, bending energy (BE) as regularisation term, and 5 mm final control point spacing. The energy term weight distribution was set to 0.995 cosNGF +0.005 BE.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy term weight distribution was set to 0.995 cosNGF +0.005 BE. The cosine similarity measure that we use is designed to be much less sensitive than standard similarities to missing correspondences [ 68 ], such as those introduced by the presence of haematoma and oedema.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their features are extracted from an image by convolving the image using a chosen filter, such as a Kernel filter or Gabor filter, or combining them to generate a feature map of the same input image [48]. Measuring the similarity can be done by applying a cosine similarity function [49].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image registration is a computational task that determines the spatial correspondence between two images of the same object acquired at different angles, at different times, using different image modalities, or under different acquisition conditions [2,3,4]. In general, an image registration method can be decomposed into three parts: building a transformation model, computing a similarity measure and performing the optimization of the registration model [4,5]. Transformation models, such as rigid or non-rigid models, delineate the transformation that can be used to represent the underlying correspondences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rigid models describe simple linear mappings such as translations, rotations, scalings and shears. However, non-rigid transformation models can represent more complex mappings, since local deformations are also taken into account, resulting thus in longer computation times [6,5]. Non-rigid image registration is an extensive research field, encompassing many applications and several specific algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%