2013 13th International Conference on Quality Software 2013
DOI: 10.1109/qsic.2013.68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Search Strategy Guided by Uncovered Branches for Concolic Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For 48 papers listed, 37 generate data using the concolic execution: (Qu and Robinson, 2011), (Xu et al ,2011), , (Dong et al, 2013), (Godboley, Sahani and Mohapatra, 2015), (Williams, 2010), (Godboley et al, 2017), (Su et al, 2014), McMinn and Harman, 2009), (Kim; Cha and Bae, 2013), (Baluda, 2011), (Papadakis, and Malevris, 2011), (Baluda;Denaro and Pezze, 2016), (Dutta;Godboley and Mohapatra, 2016), (Lu et al, 2016), (Jin et al, 2015), (Giantsios; Papaspyrou and Sagonas, 2017), (Huang et al, 2012), (Köroglu and Sem, 2016), , , , (Garg et al, 2013), (Burnim and Sem, 2008), (Majumdar, Saha and Wang, 2010), , , (Dhok;Ramanathan and Sinha, 2016), , (Jayaraman, et al, 2009) and ; 3 use mutation: (Papadakis, andMalevris, 2011), (Sarkar, Tanmoy, Basu and and . Most of the studies (38) (Qu and Robinson, 2011), (Xu et al, 2011), , (Dong et al, 2013), (Godboley, Sahani and Mohapatra, 2015), (Godboley et al, 2017), (Su et al, 2014), McMinn and Harman, 2009), (Kim;Cha and Bae, 2013), (Baluda, 2011), (Papadakis, and Malevris, 2011), …”
Section: Tools and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 48 papers listed, 37 generate data using the concolic execution: (Qu and Robinson, 2011), (Xu et al ,2011), , (Dong et al, 2013), (Godboley, Sahani and Mohapatra, 2015), (Williams, 2010), (Godboley et al, 2017), (Su et al, 2014), McMinn and Harman, 2009), (Kim; Cha and Bae, 2013), (Baluda, 2011), (Papadakis, and Malevris, 2011), (Baluda;Denaro and Pezze, 2016), (Dutta;Godboley and Mohapatra, 2016), (Lu et al, 2016), (Jin et al, 2015), (Giantsios; Papaspyrou and Sagonas, 2017), (Huang et al, 2012), (Köroglu and Sem, 2016), , , , (Garg et al, 2013), (Burnim and Sem, 2008), (Majumdar, Saha and Wang, 2010), , , (Dhok;Ramanathan and Sinha, 2016), , (Jayaraman, et al, 2009) and ; 3 use mutation: (Papadakis, andMalevris, 2011), (Sarkar, Tanmoy, Basu and and . Most of the studies (38) (Qu and Robinson, 2011), (Xu et al, 2011), , (Dong et al, 2013), (Godboley, Sahani and Mohapatra, 2015), (Godboley et al, 2017), (Su et al, 2014), McMinn and Harman, 2009), (Kim;Cha and Bae, 2013), (Baluda, 2011), (Papadakis, and Malevris, 2011), …”
Section: Tools and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%