2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A secure distributed ledger for transactive energy: The Electron Volt Exchange (EVE) blockchain

Abstract: The adoption of blockchain for Transactive Energy has gained significant momentum as it allows mutually non-trusting agents to trade energy services in a trustless energy market. Research to date has assumed that the built-in Byzantine Fault Tolerance in recording transactions in a ledger is sufficient to ensure integrity. Such work must be extended to address security gaps including random bilateral transactions that do not guarantee reliable and efficient market operation, and market participants having ince… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DER is expected to present unprecedented advantages compared to traditional centralized approaches such as lowered electrical transmission losses, security of supply, and advanced efficiency [24]. Individuals (either residential, industrial, or commercial) or a collective entity (aggregator, [25]) can be the source of local generation which then can act as a generator agent or can perform various ancillary services (such as load shaving) [26]. However, due to several economic, technical, social, and regulatory problems, the worldwide deployment rate of DER is still relatively low despite the advantages [27].…”
Section: B Sustainability Attributions and Green Energy Certificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DER is expected to present unprecedented advantages compared to traditional centralized approaches such as lowered electrical transmission losses, security of supply, and advanced efficiency [24]. Individuals (either residential, industrial, or commercial) or a collective entity (aggregator, [25]) can be the source of local generation which then can act as a generator agent or can perform various ancillary services (such as load shaving) [26]. However, due to several economic, technical, social, and regulatory problems, the worldwide deployment rate of DER is still relatively low despite the advantages [27].…”
Section: B Sustainability Attributions and Green Energy Certificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[46]. Ensuring security, transparency, and privacy in an aggregatorbased market is achievable by integrating blockchain while reducing communication latency and computation time [25].…”
Section: Ev Charging and E-mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These areas are briefly explained below: 1) Data recording: In energy use cases, DLTs can store all types of operational data through immutable digital data recording allowing transparent access to all participants. For example, authors in [9] leveraged the DLTs to develop a distributed pricing and verification algorithm for a transactive energy market. Adequate mechanisms for ensuring the privacy and cybersecurity of the data must be developed, ensuring competitive advantages and compliance requirements are met (to be addressed by the cybersecurity TF).…”
Section: Energy Dlt Use Case Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy trading can also occur between machine-to-machine (M2M) for the purpose of achieving full automation without the reliance of appointing users to authorise the trade, as shown in a conceptual framework by Sikorski, et al, which included a study of two energy suppliers that operate in tandem to provide consumers with the most economically priced electricity [13]. Despite the immutable property of blockchain, P2P markets are at potential risk from producers manipulating the power measurements recorded at connection points; However, to mitigate this, Saha, et al, proposed a blockchain-based distributed verification algorithm that penalises inconsistent measurements of current [93].…”
Section: Energy and Carbon Footprintmentioning
confidence: 99%