2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision 2007
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2007.4408927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Seeded Image Segmentation Framework Unifying Graph Cuts And Random Walker Which Yields A New Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
204
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
204
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both methods, a weighted graph is constructed. Nodes of the graph correspond to voxels in image and edges are placed between nearby voxels [22]. The edge weights are determined by the character of the image intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both methods, a weighted graph is constructed. Nodes of the graph correspond to voxels in image and edges are placed between nearby voxels [22]. The edge weights are determined by the character of the image intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graph cut is however known to be sensitive to the number of seeds [11]. If all other unary capacities λ i were set to zero, and all binary capacities β ij to some positive constant, then the smallest cut that separates the source from the sink would simply separate the positive seed from its direct neighbors.…”
Section: Joint Detection and Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The segmentation of a partially labeled image (with sparse labeled seeds) has been addressed in [1,12] as an optimal cut on a partially labeled graph using min-cut/max-flow or random walker. In a two-label case, it is possible to find a global optimum because the energy function is convex.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge here is that some new groups may be formed in G x . Instead of using a seeded segmentation as in [1,12], we conduct a pairwise subgraph grouping on G x , which is similar to [3], but with different grouping criteria. Prior to the aggregation of subgraphs in G x , we group the unlabeled nodes in S x into small subgraphs by a low-level color clustering (Mean Shift [2]).…”
Section: Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%