2017
DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2017.1307333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A self-determination theory account of self-authorship: Implications for law and public policy

Abstract: If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Autonomy support is best understood through an SDT lens if it is distinguished from lack of interference or the promotion of independence (Arvanitis & Kalliris, 2017;Ryan, 1993). Children are not supported if they are encouraged to be independent, but only if they are supported in behaving in accordance with their interests and values.…”
Section: Autonomy Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autonomy support is best understood through an SDT lens if it is distinguished from lack of interference or the promotion of independence (Arvanitis & Kalliris, 2017;Ryan, 1993). Children are not supported if they are encouraged to be independent, but only if they are supported in behaving in accordance with their interests and values.…”
Section: Autonomy Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to answer this question, we have to be able to measure whether the way people are headed is actually their own, after they have been nudged. As in every other case of seemingly libertarian policies that claim to allow individuals to go their own way, we need to take the viewpoint of the individuals themselves in order to fully evaluate nudges (Arvanitis & Kalliris, 2017). This entails adopting a psychological perspective, within which we will operationalize the aspects of autonomy that were mentioned above.…”
Section: Self-determination Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autonomy support is best understood through an SDT lens if it is distinguished from lack of interference or the promotion of independence (Arvanitis & Kalliris, 2017;Ryan, 1993). Children are not supported if encouraged to be independent, but only if they are invested in behaving per their interests and values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Susținerea autonomiei se înțelege cel mai bine prin prisma teoriei autodeterminării dacă se distinge de lipsa interferenței sau promovarea independenței (Arvanitis & Kalliris, 2017;Ryan, 1993). Copiii nu sunt susținuți dacă sunt încurajați să fie independenți, ci doar dacă sunt susținuți să se comporte în conformitate cu interesele și valorile lor.…”
Section: Introducereunclassified