1990
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/23/15/029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A semi-empirical ratio method for the calculation of parity non-conservation in caesium

Abstract: The semi-empirical method proposed by Bouchiat and Piketty for the calculation of the parity non-conserving El transition matrix element for the 65,,*-* 7s,,, transition in caesium is re-examined in terms of many body perturbation theory. A slightly modified formulation is derived and this is used to provide an improved value for the E l amplitude. The value is ElPNC = 0.904 (1 *0.02) x lo-'' (-ieaoQw/N).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of calculation has been performed by several groups (e.g. Mirtensson-Pendrill 1985a, Johnson et a1 1986, Dzuba et a1 1987a, b, Hartley 1989, Hartley and Sandars 1990a giving consistent results. We see that the final result is dominated by the zero-order value but that important contributions arise, in particular from the PNC H F contributions (illustrated by figure l(b)).…”
Section: Dzuba Er Al (1989a)mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This type of calculation has been performed by several groups (e.g. Mirtensson-Pendrill 1985a, Johnson et a1 1986, Dzuba et a1 1987a, b, Hartley 1989, Hartley and Sandars 1990a giving consistent results. We see that the final result is dominated by the zero-order value but that important contributions arise, in particular from the PNC H F contributions (illustrated by figure l(b)).…”
Section: Dzuba Er Al (1989a)mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We can write E pv 1 as the product of (Q W / − N) by a purely atomic quantity, (a,b) Paris 82-83 −0.908 ± 0.010 (f) Novosibirsk 89 −0.867 ± 0.069 (c) Boulder 85 −0.905 ± 0.009 (g) Notre Dame 90 −0.828 ± 0.020 (d) Boulder 88 −0.837 ± 0.003 exp ± 0.006 (e) theory Boulder 97 Semi-empirical * βa 3 0 from S.E. evaluations −0.935 ± 0.02 ± 0.03 (j) Paris 86 27.19 ± 0.4 (h) −0.904 ± 0.02 (k) Oxford 90 27.17 ± 0.35 (i) −0.895 ± 0.02 (l) Paris 91 βa 3 0 from first principles 27.00 ± 0.20 (m) A/B ⇒ Q exp W = −72.1 ± 0.3 exp ± 0.9 theory (a) Bouchiat et al (1982); (b) Bouchiat et al (1984); (c) Gilbert et al (1985); (d) Noecker et al (1988); (e) Wood et al (1997); (f) Dzuba et al (1989b); (g) Blundell et al (1990); (h) Bouchiat and Piketty (1983); (i) Bouchiat and Guéna (1988); (j) Bouchiat and Piketty (1986); (k) Hartley and Sandars (1990); (l) Bouchiat (1991); (m) Blundell et al (1992).…”
Section: Atomic Physics Calculations and The Present Status Of The Re...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Atomic physics calculations are necessary to extract the weak charge from the experimental data. We can write E pv 1 as the product of (Q W / − N) by a purely atomic quantity, (1983); (i) Bouchiat and Guéna (1988); (j) Bouchiat and Piketty (1986); (k) Hartley and Sandars (1990); (l) Bouchiat (1991); (m) Blundell et al (1992).…”
Section: Atomic Physics Calculations and The Present Status Of The Rementioning
confidence: 99%