2016
DOI: 10.5194/amt-9-4759-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A semiempirical error estimation technique for PWV derived from atmospheric radiosonde data

Abstract: Abstract. A semiempirical method for estimating the error and optimum number of sampled levels in precipitable water vapour (PWV) determinations from atmospheric radiosoundings is proposed. Two terms have been considered: the uncertainties in the measurements and the sampling error. Also, the uncertainty has been separated in the variance and covariance components. The sampling and covariance components have been modelled from an empirical dataset of 205 high-vertical-resolution radiosounding profiles, equippe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… is the height and is measured in metres. With the assumption of hydrostatic balance ( , are the corresponding values for dry air), the PWV can be rewritten as follows [ 33 ]: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… is the height and is measured in metres. With the assumption of hydrostatic balance ( , are the corresponding values for dry air), the PWV can be rewritten as follows [ 33 ]: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…only considered matching data points when at least 5 AERONET PWV retrievals were successful within a 1 h time window centered on the 09:00 LT radiosonde launch time. PWV uncertainty was assumed to be 10% for sunphotometer retrievals (Pérez-Ramírez et al, 2014) and 3% for radiosondes (Castro-Almazán et al, 2016).…”
Section: Aeronet and Radiosonde Pwv Retrievalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RS provides a direct measure of the actual conditions of the FA and, therefore, is particularly convenient for CR validation in mountainous terrain. Different error sources must be considered for RS (Miloshevich et al 2009), including the sampling error associated with the finite number of levels measured (Castro-Almazán et al 2016). However, these uncertainties are low enough to be neglected in this analysis.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%