2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sensitive Predictor for Potential GPI Lipid Modification Sites in Fungal Protein Sequences and its Application to Genome-wide Studies for Aspergillus nidulans, Candida albicans Neurospora crassa, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
248
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
248
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification of conserved domains was performed using the SMART protein analysis tool (Letunic et al, 2009) and InterProScan (Quevillon et al, 2005). For signal peptide prediction, Signal P v. 4.0 (Petersen et al, 2011) was used, while analyses for transmembrane helices and glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI) plasma membrane anchors were conducted using TMHMM v. 2.0 (Krogh et al, 2001) and the big-PI Fungal Predictor program (Eisenhaber et al, 2004), respectively. Target P v. 1.1 (Emanuelsson et al, 2000) and PSORT II (Nakai & Horton, 1999) were used to analyse subcellular localization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of conserved domains was performed using the SMART protein analysis tool (Letunic et al, 2009) and InterProScan (Quevillon et al, 2005). For signal peptide prediction, Signal P v. 4.0 (Petersen et al, 2011) was used, while analyses for transmembrane helices and glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI) plasma membrane anchors were conducted using TMHMM v. 2.0 (Krogh et al, 2001) and the big-PI Fungal Predictor program (Eisenhaber et al, 2004), respectively. Target P v. 1.1 (Emanuelsson et al, 2000) and PSORT II (Nakai & Horton, 1999) were used to analyse subcellular localization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these 237 proteins, the tmHmm prediction server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk /services/TMHMM/) identified 188 proteins without transmembrane domains. The Fungal BIG-PI server (http://mendel.imp.ac.at/gpi/fungi_server.html) was slightly more conservative and identified a subset of 149 (79%) as potential GPI-anchored proteins (18). Like the S. cerevisiae cell wall proteins, 115 of the Y. lipolytica proteins contained regions with high S and T content: Ͼ50 consecutive residues with Ͼ30% S and T.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For protein motifs and predicted functions, the following tools were used: signal peptides were predicted using SignalP 3.0 (Bendtsen et al, 2004) at the CBS prediction server (www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/); glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) modification sites were predicted with the big-PI fungal prediction server (http://mendel.imp.univie. ac.at/gpi/fungi_server.html) (Eisenhaber et al, 1998(Eisenhaber et al, , 2004; transmembrane domain prediction and protein localization were performed with the TMHMM 2.0 algorithm (Krogh et al, 2001) and TargetP 1.1 (Emanuelsson et al, 2000) at the CBS prediction server, or with ProtComp 6.0 at www.softberry.com, with the LOCSVMPSI 1.3 server (bioinformatics.ustc.edu.cn) (Xie et al, 2005) or with PA-SUB (www.cs.ualberta.ca/~bioinfo/PA/Sub/) (Lu et al, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%