2018
DOI: 10.1109/jphotov.2018.2819676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sensitivity Study of the Impact of Installation Parameters and System Configuration on the Performance of Bifacial PV Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is presumably due to the low height of the Sun during the winter period (January and February). There is a published report that suggests that the seasonal optimum tilt angle of the module near 35°N (similar to our study) is approximately 5° and 65° for the summer and winter solstice, respectively [7]. In summary, adopting a bifacial PV module on high albedo ground is more beneficial than attaching a horizontal single-axis tracker to a monofacial PV module in terms of the average production yield, consistency of gain with the season, required area for installation, and potentially the installation cost.…”
Section: Comparison Of Power Production Of Tracked Monofacial and Bifsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is presumably due to the low height of the Sun during the winter period (January and February). There is a published report that suggests that the seasonal optimum tilt angle of the module near 35°N (similar to our study) is approximately 5° and 65° for the summer and winter solstice, respectively [7]. In summary, adopting a bifacial PV module on high albedo ground is more beneficial than attaching a horizontal single-axis tracker to a monofacial PV module in terms of the average production yield, consistency of gain with the season, required area for installation, and potentially the installation cost.…”
Section: Comparison Of Power Production Of Tracked Monofacial and Bifsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this regard, it is believed that the replacement of conventional monofacial silicon PV modules with bifacial silicon PV modules can reduce the number of modules required for power production systems and the overall installation cost including ground area, materials, labor costs, and construction period. Further, the bifacial PV modules absorb sunlight reflected from the ground and they can generate a maximum of 30% additional electricity simply by optimizing the installation conditions (e.g., height, angle, and direction) and the reflectivity of the ground without investing in additional equipment and systems [5][6][7][8]. In the 2019 International Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaic (ITRPV) report, it is predicted that the worldwide market share of bifacial crystalline silicon PV cells used in both conventional monofacial and bifacial modules will dramatically increase from 10% (2018) to 60% (2029) in ten years, and furthermore, 50% of bifacial cells will be used in true bifacial modules in 2029.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bifacial_radiance tool (based on the backward RT), which uses the open‐source software Radiance in order to model the rear irradiance received by solar cells, has been used in the current work for the RT approach. More details on how Radiance is used to model the rear irradiance of bifacial PV modules can be found in Asgharzadeh et al…”
Section: Research Methodology and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the photovoltaic system installation is shown in Figure 4, the main components needed are solar cell modules, solar charge controllers, battery banks, and power inverters [29]. Solar cells function to convert solar radiation into electrical energy directly.…”
Section: Micro-hydro Power Plantmentioning
confidence: 99%