“…In comparison with other methods like ELISA based on monodisperse magnetic particles (10 4 –10 5 cells mL −1 LOD [ 64 ]), PCR method (10 cells mL −1 LOD [ 65 ]), real-time potentiometric biosensors based on carbon nanotubes and aptamers, (8 × 10 2 cells mL −1 LOD [ 66 ]), the sensitivity of MPPs based on SERS is better or equal but it is simpler in procedure while other approaches require special expensive instrumentation, trained technicians, or complicated pretreatment protocol [ 18 ]. Even in comparison with Au NP-based SERS (10–13 cells mL −1 LOD [ 67 , 68 ]), the method needs a separation step of target, MPP-based SERS only need 10 s for separation based on magnetic property [ 18 ]. For aromatic dye detection, SERS is a powerful method in this field; however, many aromatic dyes have a poor affinity in interactions with SERS material that leads to the necessity of modification of SERS substrate that can detect aromatic dyes as low as 1 nM LOD [ 69 , 70 , 71 ].…”