2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple High-Content Cell Cycle Assay Reveals Frequent Discrepancies between Cell Number and ATP and MTS Proliferation Assays

Abstract: In order to efficiently characterize both antiproliferative potency and mechanism of action of small molecules targeting the cell cycle, we developed a high-throughput image-based assay to determine cell number and cell cycle phase distribution. Using this we profiled the effects of experimental and approved anti-cancer agents with a range mechanisms of action on a set of cell lines, comparing direct cell counting versus two metabolism-based cell viability/proliferation assay formats, ATP-dependent bioluminesc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
126
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For direct cell count-based cytotoxicity assay, cells were incubated with ADC for 3 days (unless indicated otherwise) and then fixed, permeabilized, and nuclei-stained in one step, as described in ref. 29.…”
Section: Flow Cytometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For direct cell count-based cytotoxicity assay, cells were incubated with ADC for 3 days (unless indicated otherwise) and then fixed, permeabilized, and nuclei-stained in one step, as described in ref. 29.…”
Section: Flow Cytometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MTT assay is not reliable for the drugs with an action on mitochondria 34. And, most importantly, MTT assay relates to cytostatic effect, neither of cytotoxicity, apoptosis nor viability of the treated cells 35, 36. Some cells could remain perfectly viable with low metabolic activity and it may cause “fake” data 37…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the traditional methods, this assay is more efficient, more reliable and faster. However, the employed methodology has limitations (7,24). It measures metabolic activity (mitochondrial function of PDLF), not necessarily the viability and cell proliferation (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%