A simple model for simulation of particle deaggregation of few‐particle aggregates

Abstract

A proper mechanistic understanding of the deaggregation process of small colloidal particle aggregates is of generic importance within many fields of science and engineering. The methodology for modeling colloidal deaggregation is currently limited to analytical solutions in the two‐particle case and time consuming numerical algorithms, such as Brownian Dynamics (BD) simulations, for many‐particle aggregates. To address this issue, a simplified alternative model that describes deaggregation of few‐particle aggregates is presented. The model includes end‐particle deaggregation and a particle reconfiguration mechanism, which are the two most important mechanisms for deaggregation. Comparison of the calculated first passage time distribution for various two‐, three‐, four‐, and five‐particle aggregates with the corresponding result using BD simulations confirms the validity of the model. It is concluded that the dominating mechanism behind deaggregation can be quantified using a deaggregation number, which reflects the time scale for reconfiguration relative to the time scale for end‐particle deaggregation. © 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 60: 1863–1869, 2014

Waiting-time distributions of particle entrapments in clustered states generated by short-range attractive, long-range repulsive (SALR) interactions

“…4 not only confirms this qualitative observation, but also shows that this is caused by the appearance of a distinct dynamical process. In an attempt to identify this much slower process some isolated model clusters have been investigated using BD simulations, similarly to what has been done previously [51,52]. These clusters are composed of particles subject to the same SALR interaction at T * = 0.12 with particles placed initially at separations corresponding to the minimum of the interaction potential.…”

Reversible Cluster Aggregation and Growth Model for Graphene Suspensions

“…The time scales can vary from minutes to hours or even months . These are significantly larger than the typical scales handled by molecular dynamics or even coarse‐grained molecular dynamics, Brownian dynamics, and dissipative particle dynamics simulations. A Stokesian dynamics simulation would seem more appropriate in terms of length‐scale but there are no reported efforts to model the dispersion behavior of a large number of graphene‐like particles.…”