2018
DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2018.1498886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simulation study for count data models under varying degrees of outliers and zeros

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with the results of our simulation study stating that when the overdispersion occur, the ZIP model performed relatively the same or better than the Hurdle Poisson model under different scenarios, but ZIP and Hurdle models are better than the standard Poisson model for all given n based on AIC. These results are in agreement with some other studies stating that Zero Inflated and Hurdle models are similar in terms of AIC [5,6]. Another study also concluded a result somewhat similar to that found in our study that the ZIP model performed better than the Poisson hurdle (PH) model [10].…”
Section: B Case Studysupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in line with the results of our simulation study stating that when the overdispersion occur, the ZIP model performed relatively the same or better than the Hurdle Poisson model under different scenarios, but ZIP and Hurdle models are better than the standard Poisson model for all given n based on AIC. These results are in agreement with some other studies stating that Zero Inflated and Hurdle models are similar in terms of AIC [5,6]. Another study also concluded a result somewhat similar to that found in our study that the ZIP model performed better than the Poisson hurdle (PH) model [10].…”
Section: B Case Studysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A number of studies have compared the Zero Inflated and Hurdle models. For example, research has concluded that Zero Inflated and Hurdle models are indiscernible in terms of goodness of fit measures namely the Akaike information criterion (AIC) [5,6]. Research has compared different counts models including ZIP, Hurdle Poisson (HP), zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB), hurdle negative binomial (HNB), Poisson, and negative binomial (NB) models for analyzing inpatient hospitalization data of patients' psychiatric disorders [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Nekesa et al (2019) reported results from simulation study and real data analysis of exposed infant diagnosis, showing the negative binomial emerging as the best performing model when fitting data with both structured and non-structured zeros under various settings. Tüzen et al (2018) reported simulation scenarios, where the NB model outperformed other count models in the presence of outliers and/or excess zeros. Allison (2012) noted that some applications exist in which a compelling case could be made for a zero-inflated model and suggested the use of ZINB instead of ZIP when modeling zero-inflated count data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fernandez and Vatcheva BMC Medical Research Methodology (2022) 22:211 Tuzen et al (2018) examined the performance in terms of fit of Poisson, NB, ZIP, ZINB, Poisson Hurdle and NB Hurdle models under various outliers and zero-inflation scenarios of simulated data and found that ZINB and NB Hurdle were superior to Poisson, NB, and ZIP models. They also reported that in some scenarios, the NB model outperformed all models in the presence of outliers and/or excess zeros [44]. Tlhaloganyang et al [45] compared NB with ZIP and ZINB models using different real datasets characterized by overdispersion and zero-inflation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these studies, the conclusions are inconsistent. Some revealed that ZI and hurdle models are indistinguishable with respect to goodness of fit measures ( Xu et al 2015 ; Tüzen et al 2018 ); whereas, some studies found the hurdle model had a better fit than the ZI model ( Min and Agresti 2005 ; Sharker et al 2020 ) and other empirical application found ZI model performs better than the hurdle model ( Hu et al 2011 ). It is therefore desired to identify the situations where hurdle models perform better than ZI and vice versa through simulation studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%