1993
DOI: 10.1109/4.245590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A single-bit-line cross-point cell activation (SCPA) architecture for ultra-low-power SRAM's

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case also the delay contribution of each component is balanced. The same conclusion can be reached from state-of-the-art SRAM designs [15,26,27]. Moreover, it is reasonable to expect that these contributions will continue to be balanced, because a well-balanced and optimised memory design cannot be fully dominated by the energy or delay of one of its components.…”
Section: E-sram Modelmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…In this case also the delay contribution of each component is balanced. The same conclusion can be reached from state-of-the-art SRAM designs [15,26,27]. Moreover, it is reasonable to expect that these contributions will continue to be balanced, because a well-balanced and optimised memory design cannot be fully dominated by the energy or delay of one of its components.…”
Section: E-sram Modelmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Another possible write pattern is 1->0, which is considerably difficult in single-bitline configuration because it presents conditions similar to that of the read mode. Boosted wordline technique [1] is a traditional solution to this problem, but it potentially induces the unreliable read and hardware overheads. Instead of the boosted wordline technique, the SWDR cell uses a tail transistor N3 to facilitate writing node B from low to high.…”
Section: Write '1' Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contributions of the proposed SWDR cell are as follows. (1) Unlike the conventional SRAM cell where the power dissipated in both writing '0' and '1' are the same, the SWDR cell can prevent the single write bitline from being discharged if the written value is '0'. Therefore, the write '0' power is far less than the write '1' power in the SWDR cell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) Writing cell state from low to high is considerably difficult in single-bitline configuration because it presents conditions similar to that of the read mode. Instead of the traditional boosted wordline technique [1], the SWDR cell uses a tail transistor to disconnect the pull-down path, such that writing cell state to high is easy to be achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%