2017 20th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/wpmc.2017.8301836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A single node vehicle detection system using an adaptive signal adjustment technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kwon et al [ 26 ] used only a 20 cm spaced sensor pair for speed estimation. The time delay was calculated by modified cross-correlation function and adaptive signal rescaling.…”
Section: Related Work: Comparison Of Speed Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kwon et al [ 26 ] used only a 20 cm spaced sensor pair for speed estimation. The time delay was calculated by modified cross-correlation function and adaptive signal rescaling.…”
Section: Related Work: Comparison Of Speed Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by modified cross-correlation algorithms from [ 24 , 26 ] it was proposed to utilize magnetic signature segmentation in order to isolate distorted features. Signal segmentation is performed on the first order derivative of the signature since it crosses the zero level multiple times.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They depend on the distance between sensors, speed of vehicle and the filtering signals method used. As a comparison, the errors for variously constructed systems with magnetic sensors placed on the road lane at a distance D = 6 m are RMSE = 5.1 km/h, MAPE = 2.65% ( MAPE - Mean Absolute Percentage Error) [27], and at a distance of 20 cm MAPE = 4.16% or 2.10% [28]. With regards to the system with induction loops, in publication [29], accuracy measures were given for four categories of vehicles: RMSE —from 2.5 km/h to 8.6 km/h, MAPE —from 1.8% to 9%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the systematic error caused by the radar device, the two boundaries present a certain confidence level for describing the effective angle of the target. In this paper, we define the effective confidence level as the proportion of max with the boundary value by Equation (5) and is also shown in Figure 5: It is evident from Figure 4 that the angular values decline to the minimum value as the target moves farther from the radar device. Considering this, the systematic error makes an everincreasing effect on the accuracy of the angle value of the target as shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Angle Threshold Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%