Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2554688.2554767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A soft error vulnerability analysis framework for Xilinx FPGAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The toolkit offers a rich Application Programming Interface (API) to parse, analyse and manipulate XDL files (which can be easily created from Xilinx netlists). A very recent work that makes use of this toolkit is presented in [Sari et al 2014]. In this paper, the authors estimate the susceptibility of an FPGA design.…”
Section: Mitigation Design Techniques Aimed At Design-time Fault Avoimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The toolkit offers a rich Application Programming Interface (API) to parse, analyse and manipulate XDL files (which can be easily created from Xilinx netlists). A very recent work that makes use of this toolkit is presented in [Sari et al 2014]. In this paper, the authors estimate the susceptibility of an FPGA design.…”
Section: Mitigation Design Techniques Aimed At Design-time Fault Avoimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the error rates, we use CREME96 to predict the error rate of a configuration bit for each device in the same orbit as the EO-1 satellite from our case study mission. We calculate the error rate of each resource as the number of configuration bits used to program the resource times the error rate of a single configuration bit [12]. This is a worst-case estimation technique that assumes all bits associated with a resource are able to cause an error.…”
Section: -2 In Ternal-memory Ex Tensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FPGAs are more vulnerable to SEUs compared to Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASIC) [2]. In SRAM-based FPGAs, all programmable resources (particularly routing switches) are configured by SRAM cells; these devices are very susceptible to such errors [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%