2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2017.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spatio-temporal accessibility measure for modelling activity participation in discretionary activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results have been mixed. Some have shown that measures of accessibility are associated with increased trip-making and activity participation (Vickerman, 1974;Koenig, 1980;Thill & Kim, 2005;Fransen et al, 2018), but other studies have also found that this association was weak or not statistically significant (Hanson & Schwab, 1987;Ewing et al, 1996;Kitamura et al, 2001). Moreover, results vary by mode of transportation.…”
Section: Accessibility and Activity Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results have been mixed. Some have shown that measures of accessibility are associated with increased trip-making and activity participation (Vickerman, 1974;Koenig, 1980;Thill & Kim, 2005;Fransen et al, 2018), but other studies have also found that this association was weak or not statistically significant (Hanson & Schwab, 1987;Ewing et al, 1996;Kitamura et al, 2001). Moreover, results vary by mode of transportation.…”
Section: Accessibility and Activity Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…use measures of transit access to retail to examine its effects on shopping trips). Moreover, participation in discretionary activities may be better modelled using space-time accessibility measures, rather than the place-based measures employed in our study (Fransen et al, 2018). Generating separate models for participation in different activity types (e.g.…”
Section: Study Limitations and Directions For Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, different data sources and data analytics methods have been used to analyze key aspects of transport inequity, such as gender, age and low-income families (Hanson and Hanson, 1980;Offer and Schneider, 2011;Loo and Lam, 2013). In particular, there is a vast literature about travel behavior research following the conceptual framework of Hagerstrand's time geography (Hagerstrand, 1970;Hanson and Hanson, 1980;Miller, 1991;Kwan, 1998;Buliung and Kanaroglou, 2006;Buliung and Remmel, 2008;Shaw et al, 2008;Wilson, 2008;Lam et al, 2013;Choi et al, 2014;Babb et al, 2017;Fransen et al, 2018). Researchers have used tools such as the activity space and spacetime prisms (Buliung and Kanaroglou, 2006) to visualize mobility patterns.…”
Section: Urban Mobility Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the idea of equity always implies a moral judgement, equality does not have to imply a normative stance if the term is used in a descriptive sense to indicate full equality or sameness (van Wee & Geurs, 2011). The studies in transportation equity generally look at differences in the levels of accessibility to opportunities or daily travel behavior patterns of various social groups as proxies to reflect different levels of well-being or how those groups are more or less integrated into society (Akyelken, 2017;Fransen et al, 2018;Vasconcellos, 2005).…”
Section: Nexus Of Justice and Transportationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strand of investigation would need a much better understanding of how and to what extent objective measures of accessibility relate to subjectively perceived accessibility levels and to what extent they correspond to activity participation. These questions have thus far received relatively little attention in the literature and remain largely unanswered (Cascetta et al, 2013;Curl et al, 2015;Fransen et al, 2018). Future studies could investigate, for example, how the association between activity participation levels and perceived and objectively measured accessibility varies across the population and to what extent this variation is affected by the built environment, Moreover, while the academic literature has often recognized that increasing physical mobility and accessibility are cause and effect of social mobility (Chetty et al, 2014;Kaufmann et al, 2004;Kronlid, 2008;Lucas, 2012), only a few studies have developed robust identification strategies to measure how accessibility gains from transport policies have impacted employment and educational outcomes (Cervero et al, 2002;Dawkins et al, 2015;Muralidharan & Prakash, 2017).…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%