2017
DOI: 10.1017/apr.2017.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spectral method for community detection in moderately sparse degree-corrected stochastic block models

Abstract: We consider community detection in Degree-Corrected Stochastic Block Models (DC-SBM). We propose a spectral clustering algorithm based on a suitably normalized adjacency matrix. We show that this algorithm consistently recovers the block-membership of all but a vanishing fraction of nodes, in the regime where the lowest degree is of order log(n) or higher. Recovery succeeds even for very heterogeneous degree-distributions. The used algorithm does not rely on parameters as input. In particular, it does not need… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirically, the larger class of DCBMs is able to provide possibly much better fits to many real world network datasets [23]. Since the proposal of the model, there have been various methods proposed for community detection in DCBMs, including but not limited to spectral clustering [24,18,15,11] and modularity based approaches [17,28,3,5]. On the theoretical side, [10] provides an information-theoretic characterization of the impossibility region of community detection for DCBMs with two clusters, and sufficient conditions have been given in [28,5] for strongly and weakly consistent community detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirically, the larger class of DCBMs is able to provide possibly much better fits to many real world network datasets [23]. Since the proposal of the model, there have been various methods proposed for community detection in DCBMs, including but not limited to spectral clustering [24,18,15,11] and modularity based approaches [17,28,3,5]. On the theoretical side, [10] provides an information-theoretic characterization of the impossibility region of community detection for DCBMs with two clusters, and sufficient conditions have been given in [28,5] for strongly and weakly consistent community detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clustering is asymptotically trivial when the weights C ab differ by O(1), as a vanishing error classification rate is easily guaranteed [6]. We shall instead consider the regime where the clustering performance is not asymptotically perfect.…”
Section: A Model and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus consider here the non-trivial regime where C ab = O(1) but differ only by O(n − 1 2 ). Spectral clustering on the adjacency matrix of a DC-SBM however fails to cluster the nodes as the leading eigenvectors tend to follow a mixture of the degree distribution and class-wise canonical vectors, instead of purely aligning to the latter, therefore leading to ambiguities in classification and a trend to over-clustering (see top of Figure 1 and [7]). We thus work here on a normalized version L of the adjacency (precisely the modularity) matrix defined, for 1 We shall see (as already observed in [7]) that the dominant eigenvectors of L are strongly aligned to the class-wise canonical eigenvectors, thus recover the lost clustering ability of A (see bottom of Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%