2005
DOI: 10.1890/04-1343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Statistical Test to Show Negligible Trend

Abstract: The usual statistical tests of trend are inappropriate for demonstrating the absence of trend. This is because failure to reject the null hypothesis of no trend does not prove that null hypothesis. The appropriate statistical method is based on an equivalence test. The null hypothesis is that the trend is not zero, i.e., outside an a priori specified equivalence region defining trends that are considered to be negligible. This null hypothesis can be tested with two one-sided tests. A proposed equivalence regio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, our definition of the noncritical effect is somewhat arbitrary and does not fully include information about data variations. The use of an equivalence test (e.g., Dixon and Pechmann 2005) would be valuable if the unacceptable effect size (critical effect size, see Munkittrick et al 2009) can be specified. However, it is difficult to specifically determine such effect sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, our definition of the noncritical effect is somewhat arbitrary and does not fully include information about data variations. The use of an equivalence test (e.g., Dixon and Pechmann 2005) would be valuable if the unacceptable effect size (critical effect size, see Munkittrick et al 2009) can be specified. However, it is difficult to specifically determine such effect sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used false discovery rate control (FDR; Benjamini andHochberg 1995, Garcia 2004) to correct for multiple statistical tests within each seasonal community. We also used equivalence tests to examine if macroecological patterns were significantly similar across treatments (Dixon and Pechmann 2005; see Appendix C for details). SAD, STR, and SAR are interrelated measures of community structure (Storch et al 2008).…”
Section: Statistical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing α is wise if the population of interest is threatened by inaction (Gryska et al 1997;Daulwater et al 2009) because a greater α improves the survey's ability to detect population trends at the cost of increasing the probability of a false detection. Additionally, tests for negligible trend can be used as a complement to traditional hypothesis testing (Dixon and Pechmann 2005). With this method, the alternative hypothesis tests whether the 90% confidence interval falls within a specified (by the researcher) interval around zero.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this method, the alternative hypothesis tests whether the 90% confidence interval falls within a specified (by the researcher) interval around zero. As such, it is possible for poorly estimated trends to be not significantly different from zero and not significantly negligible with the same level of confidence for both tests (Dixon and Pechmann 2005). The event variance component was estimated to be negative by the mixed model used to estimate variance components for the three levels of sampling in surveys for DHP larvae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%