2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A structural analysis of the differential cytotoxicity of chemicals in the NCI-60 cancer cell lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Estas líneas celulares son conocidas como las líneas NCI -60 y están conformadas por células provenientes de ocho melanomas, seis leucemias, ocho cánceres de mama, dos de próstata, nueve de pulmón, siete de cólon, seis de ovarios, ocho de riñón y seis de cáncer del sistema nervioso central. Con los resultados de las pruebas de citotoxicidad se halla la concentración inhibitoria media (IC 50 ) como la requerida para inhibir el crecimiento celular (21).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Estas líneas celulares son conocidas como las líneas NCI -60 y están conformadas por células provenientes de ocho melanomas, seis leucemias, ocho cánceres de mama, dos de próstata, nueve de pulmón, siete de cólon, seis de ovarios, ocho de riñón y seis de cáncer del sistema nervioso central. Con los resultados de las pruebas de citotoxicidad se halla la concentración inhibitoria media (IC 50 ) como la requerida para inhibir el crecimiento celular (21).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Moreover, the compounds could be conducting an antiproliferative activity by means of this receptor, this if the extrinsic pathway were considered; however, another way of action would be the intrinsic or mitochondrial pathway where it is related to oxidative stress (Kroemer et al, 2009). To make it clear, according to the GI50 obtained for the rest of the fractions by the Probit test, they are not worthy to be further investigated for bioactivity since their GI50 do not meet the NCI criteria for the development of drugs (Boyd & Paull, 1995;Chakravarti & Klopman, 2008).…”
Section: Characterization Of Sub-fraction M11bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, unlike current anticholinesterase insecticides that are low-hanging fruits stemming from World War II research on nerve gas, cysteine-targeting chemicals are high-hanging fruits for the following reasons. First, most known alkylating agents or electrophiles cannot be used to target the cysteine residue because these agents, such as Michael acceptors [80], can cause significant human toxicity. Second, it is disadvantageous to establish affinity by designing a long-chain molecule such as bis-(7)-tacrine [25] that binds deep in the active-site gorge, because such molecules are associated with a high likelihood that insects will develop resistance through active-site mutations of AChE, as mentioned above.…”
Section: Development Of Cysteine-targeting Insecticidesmentioning
confidence: 99%