1958
DOI: 10.1159/000269077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Deprived Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When studied all the children (JV" = 188) were in care and living in large children's homes. The main results of this study have been reported elsewhere (Pringle and Bossio, 1958). Though a considerable proportion of children showed symptoms of maladjustment, some 30 per cent were considered to be stable by their teachers and the house staff, when rated on the Bristol Social Adjustment Guides.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…When studied all the children (JV" = 188) were in care and living in large children's homes. The main results of this study have been reported elsewhere (Pringle and Bossio, 1958). Though a considerable proportion of children showed symptoms of maladjustment, some 30 per cent were considered to be stable by their teachers and the house staff, when rated on the Bristol Social Adjustment Guides.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Insti tutionalization with maternal absence, even when an infant's care was limited to a small fraction of maternal time (spread over several substi tutes), produced significant developmental deficits. More specifically, Pringle and Bossio (1958) found earlier entering institutionalized chil dren performed more poorly on the verbal section of the intelligence test and on other tests of language development. Thus, it would appear that extended periods of maternal deprivation and the resulting lack of stimu lation tend to contribute to a deficit in language development.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Many high-risk handicapped children were without the benefit of preschool stimulation programs geared to foster their learning potential. This presented a paradox; i.e., the children from the homes that more likely had environments most similar to the institutional environment re ported by Pringle and Bossio (1958) and Spitz (1973) were least affected by the programs emphasizing early stimulation.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many high-risk handicapped children were without the benefit of preschool stimulation programs geared to foster their learning potential. This presented a paradox; i.e., the children from the homes that more likely had environments most similar to the institutional environment re ported by Pringle and Bossio (1958) and Spitz (1973) were least affected by the programs emphasizing early stimulation. Many such programs from the late 60s and 70s have been federally validated by the Joint Dissemination Review Panel, United States Office of Education.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%