2007
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2006.889013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Successive Decoding Strategy for Channels With Memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main novelty of our proposal is the application of the principle of interleaving and staged decoding to the phase noise channel, where the individual stage consists of demodulation and decoding. Compared to the previous literature on interleaving and staged decoding, specifically references [14], [15], [16], [17], other minor novelties that we can claim are the following.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main novelty of our proposal is the application of the principle of interleaving and staged decoding to the phase noise channel, where the individual stage consists of demodulation and decoding. Compared to the previous literature on interleaving and staged decoding, specifically references [14], [15], [16], [17], other minor novelties that we can claim are the following.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The use of interleaving and staged decoding aided by past decisions has been proposed in [14] and expanded in [15] for the InterSymbol Interference (ISI) AWGN channel, where the generic stage consists of equalization and decoding. The general principle has then found application to a variety of channels with memory [16], [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to obtain a lower bound for the constrained capacity, a successive decoding strategy has been considered in [52], [53]. In this strategy, channel estimation and MUD in successive decoding are replaced by suboptimal ones that allow us to evaluate the performance analytically.…”
Section: A Joint Ce-mudd Based On Lmmse Channel Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there has been prior work on receiver design for joint processing (e.g., [6]- [8]), to the best of our knowledge there is not yet a general understanding of the conditions (in terms of signal-to-noise ratio, fading rate, and antenna configurations) in which joint processing provides a substantial improvement. Given that joint processing is more complex than separate processing, such a quantification appears very useful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%