2004
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200404000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Clinical Prescribing Philosophies for Hyperopia

Abstract: Pediatric eye care providers show a lack of consensus on prescribing philosophies for hyperopic children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12. There is also variation with regards to actual prescribing practices. Reiter et al 25 used a questionnaire to compare the prescribing practices of German ophthalmologists with a previous survey of U.S. ophthalmologists and optometrists by Lyons et al 26 The responses from German ophthalmologists and U.S. optometrists indicated that they would prescribe at similar levels of asymptomatic hyperopia whereas the U.S. ophthalmologists prescribed at higher levels. For example, for children of 4 years of age, 91% of German ophthalmologists, 89% of U.S. optometrists, and 42% of U.S. ophthalmologists would prescribe once the hyperopia was Ͼ3 D. Farbrother 14 used a questionnaire to study UK hospital optometrists prescribing practices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12. There is also variation with regards to actual prescribing practices. Reiter et al 25 used a questionnaire to compare the prescribing practices of German ophthalmologists with a previous survey of U.S. ophthalmologists and optometrists by Lyons et al 26 The responses from German ophthalmologists and U.S. optometrists indicated that they would prescribe at similar levels of asymptomatic hyperopia whereas the U.S. ophthalmologists prescribed at higher levels. For example, for children of 4 years of age, 91% of German ophthalmologists, 89% of U.S. optometrists, and 42% of U.S. ophthalmologists would prescribe once the hyperopia was Ͼ3 D. Farbrother 14 used a questionnaire to study UK hospital optometrists prescribing practices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). The main effect of viewing condition on the accommodative gain was statistically significant (F (5,466) ϭ 14.7; P Ͻ 0.001), the main effect of age approached statistical significance (F (4,466) ϭ 2.3; P ϭ 0.06), and their interaction was not significant (F (20,466) ϭ 1.5; P ϭ 0.09). A post hoc Games Howell test for viewing condition indicated that the binocular accommodative gain was statistically significantly larger than the gains under Ϫ4 D (P ϭ 0.006), ϩ2 D (P ϭ 0.001), and ϩ4 D (P ϭ 0.02) anisometropia conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Management strategies (e.g., preventative prescription of refractive correction) for anisometropia vary significantly among clinicians and are largely based on clinical consensus rather than objective evidence. For instance, in a survey of 59 pediatric ophthalmologists and 161 pediatric optometrists, Lyons et al 20 noted that 47.3% of ophthalmologists and 28.5% of optometrists are likely to prescribe refractive correction for hyperopic anisometropia Ͼ1 D in 6-month-old infants. These percentages change for a higher magnitude of anisometropia, with 38.6% of ophthalmologists and 56.9% of optometrists waiting until hyperopic anisometropia reaches Ͼ3 D to prescribe in the same age group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, they cannot be sure how refractive correction might affect the development of very large hyperopic errors, which showed very variable degrees of emmetropization in their observations. Of note, children with hyperopic refractive errors with or more than +5 D would be taken into consideration for optical correction as general guidelines for most practitioners to improve visual acuity (22). Therefore, it would have been instructive to have studied matched groups of children with corrected and uncorrected refraction who have high hyperopic refractive errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%