2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.datak.2008.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A temporal object relational SQL language with attribute timestamping in a temporal transparency environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are very few (Chau and Chittayasothorn 2008;and Snodgrass 2010) commercial databases yet on the market, perhaps due to the complex nature of temporal data. This article presents a technical outline of how to use the conventional commercial databases to update with temporal data.…”
Section: Temporal Data Update Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are very few (Chau and Chittayasothorn 2008;and Snodgrass 2010) commercial databases yet on the market, perhaps due to the complex nature of temporal data. This article presents a technical outline of how to use the conventional commercial databases to update with temporal data.…”
Section: Temporal Data Update Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current commercial database systems provide little built-in capabilities to capture transaction lineage or to support query language for temporal data management (Mahmood et al 2010). As of today, a few companies started providing time-referenced data storing functionality and SQL facilities in their DBMS system (Chau and Chittayasothorn 2008;and Snodgrass 2010). In data warehouses, data comes from many sources and data warehouse refreshes happen several times a day.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, little Object-Relational temporal extensions have been proposed [23,24,25]. In [23] the authors propose a valid-time extension of SQL, based on the model proposed in [11], and its implementation on an Object-Relational DBMS.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [24], the algebra of a generalized temporal database model supporting temporal relations nested to any finite depth is presented; this model deal with the valid-time dimension and the author does not yet, to our knowledge, defines an extension of SQL to support the temporal nested features. The temporal language proposed in [25] integrates only the valid-time dimension at the attribute level, and is also based on SQL/Temporal; we have not perceived a real SQL3 extension, but only how to simplify the expression of temporal predicates with the operators of the temporal logic. Indeed, the language considers that the operators used in this standard -as the cartesian product and the set operators of union, intersection and difference-does not influenced by the introduction of the temporal dimension.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the temporal data models use the term object loosely, one we may think of the possibility of integrating non-temporal database language such OODB or ORDB. With a non-temporal database language, it is a great burden for DB users to deal with temporal data all on their own [5]. For representing time varying data from the real world into objects, class diagram of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) has become a standard of the Information Technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%