2016 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC) 2016
DOI: 10.22489/cinc.2016.184-315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Tensor Approach to Heart Sound Classification

Abstract: In the context of the PhysioNet/CinC 2016 Challenge, where a relatively large, labeled data set of phonocardiograms (PCGs) was made available, this work presents a mixed approach to the problem of its binary classification. Instead of laboriously selecting a set of PCG signal features that capture the fundamental differences between healthy and unhealthy heart sounds, a rather exhaustive set of features is generated for each heart beat segment, which is then represented in a 4-way tensor. In a second stage, su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5][6][7] Linear predictive coding coefficients have been also used. 7 In terms of classifiers, competitors mostly used Neural Networks, 5,8,9 Support Vector Machines 10,11 and Random Forest techniques. [12][13][14] In parallel, sparse representations of the heart sounds (Matching Pursuit decomposition and Linear Predictive Coding of the residual) have been shown to provide a compact and meaningful representation of PCG signals.…”
Section: Prior Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] Linear predictive coding coefficients have been also used. 7 In terms of classifiers, competitors mostly used Neural Networks, 5,8,9 Support Vector Machines 10,11 and Random Forest techniques. [12][13][14] In parallel, sparse representations of the heart sounds (Matching Pursuit decomposition and Linear Predictive Coding of the residual) have been shown to provide a compact and meaningful representation of PCG signals.…”
Section: Prior Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notable features reported for this dataset includes, time, frequency and statistical features [8], Mel-frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) [9], and Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) [10]. Classifiers like SVM [11], k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) [9], Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) [10], [12] and Random Forest [8], deep learning approaches with 1D & 2D CNNs [13], [14], and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) [15] based architectures were employed in the challenge submissions. The winning algorithm, similar to a good number of other submissions, proposed an ensemble; a static filter front-end 1D-CNN model combined with an Adaboost-Abstain classifier using a threshold-based voting algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2016 Physionet/CinC Challenge released an archive of 4430 PCG recordings, which is the most extensive open-source heart sound dataset to date. Time, frequency and statistical features [6], Melfrequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) [7], and Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT), were some of the commonly used features by the PhysioNet challenge entrants. Among the top scoring systems, Maknickas et al [8] extracted Melfrequency Spectral Coefficients (MFSC) from unsegmented signals and used a 2D CNN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plesinger et al [9] proposed a novel segmentation method, a histogram based feature selection method and parameterized sigmoid functions per feature, to discriminate between classes. Various machine learning algorithms including SVM [10], k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) [7], Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) [11], [12], Random Forest [6], 1D [13] and 2D CNNs [8], and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) [14] were employed in the challenge. A good number of submissions used an ensemble of classifiers with a voting algorithm [6], [11], [12], [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%