2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-dimensional model of the rat hindlimb: Musculoskeletal geometry and muscle moment arms

Abstract: As a first step towards developing a dynamic model of the rat hindlimb, we measured muscle attachment and joint center coordinates relative to bony landmarks using stereophotogrammetry. Using these measurements, we analyzed muscle moment arms as functions of joint angle for most hindlimb muscles, and tested the hypothesis that postural change alone is sufficient to alter the function of selected muscles of the leg. We described muscle attachment sites as second-order curves. The length of the fit parabola and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
119
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
119
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Smith et al ., 2007; Johnson et al ., 2008; Charles et al ., 2016) or do not analyse the patellofemoral joint separately from the knee joint (e.g. O'Neill et al ., 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith et al ., 2007; Johnson et al ., 2008; Charles et al ., 2016) or do not analyse the patellofemoral joint separately from the knee joint (e.g. O'Neill et al ., 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results suggest that spasticity can affect muscles from the same compartment differently. It should be noted that the architecture of SO in rat (14,23) does not resemble that of SO in humans (18,25) and hence, comparisons should be made with caution. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that it would be of interest to investigate more than one muscle (typically GA) when investigating the mechanical properties of human spastic limbs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that only the proximal TA nerve branch was excited. Based on existing data (Huijing and Baan, 2001a;Johnson et al, 2008;Maas et al, 2001) estimated maximum TA ankle moment was 21 mNm. Combining this with our data (TA moment 18.7 7 3.4 mNm; see Section 3) indicates that we excited $ 90% of TA muscle fibers.…”
Section: Experimental Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%