2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10828-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A threefold empirical analysis of the relationship between regional income inequality and water equity using Tapio decoupling model, WPAT equation, and the local dissimilarity index: evidence from Bulgaria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining natural gas consumption changes, elasticity coefficient, and GDP, we can subdivide the decoupling types into eight situations, shown in Table 1 . 47 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combining natural gas consumption changes, elasticity coefficient, and GDP, we can subdivide the decoupling types into eight situations, shown in Table 1 . 47 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining natural gas consumption changes, elasticity coefficient, and GDP, we can subdivide the decoupling types into eight situations, shown in Table 1. 47 The decoupling relationship between economic growth and natural gas consumption is calculated by the decoupling elasticity index, but this index cannot be used to study specific factors affecting the decoupling state. While LMDI model has the opposite attribute, which can be applied to analyzing the influence of specific factors on natural gas consumption, without a decoupling relationship.…”
Section: Decoupling Model For Natural Gas Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The types of decoupling can essentially be divided into coupling, decoupling, and negative decoupling. In addition, according to the elasticity coefficient, the change of water usage and the change of GDP, the decoupling types can be subdivided into eight cases (Table 1) [45]. The water usage growth rate is lower than the economic growth rate.…”
Section: Decoupling Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femia and Luks [11] established a policy framework for the overall strategy of decoupling ecological sustainability from individual well-being at the application level, pointing out the limitations of traditional environmental policies from the perspective of sustainability. Most scholars have studied the decoupling between economic growth and resource consumption at the national and local levels: Tasbasi [12] used the WPAT equation to measure the effects of population, income, and intensity on water demand in the Balkans. Yousaf [13] and Climation and Pardo [14] studied the decoupling between economic growth and resource consumption from national or regional perspectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, as water, energy, and food are interrelated resources, changes in one or more variables will be transmitted to others, which makes the changes of all variables to have evolutionary characteristics. Compared with other methods for evaluating decoupling [12,18] which have limitations of incomplete classification and insufficient quantitative information, the Tapio model can finely measure the decoupling degree [22], which provides a certain advantage of judging the evolution process of the decoupling status. Third, considering the fact that the Logarithmic Mean Divisional Index (LMDI) can decompose all factors without residual error [23,24], it is used to quantitatively analyze the influence of variables on resource consumption [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%