2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-010-9238-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tool predicting future mean arterial blood pressure values improves the titration of vasoactive drugs

Abstract: Patient-specific drug sensitivity identifi- cation significantly improved the prediction of future MAP. By predicting and displaying the expected MAP 5 min in the future, the advisory system helped nurses titrate faster, reduced their perceived workload and might improve patient safety.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the model, nurses reached the desired mean arterial pressure in significantly less time (4.1 vs 10.2 minutes without the system), made fewer adjustments to the infusion rate (4 vs 6), and avoided inducing hypotension. 21 However, simulated data were used in this study, so it is unclear if the results translate into real-world practice and limit the generalizability of the findings. In another study, physiologic responses (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were predicted after titrations of vasoactive infusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the model, nurses reached the desired mean arterial pressure in significantly less time (4.1 vs 10.2 minutes without the system), made fewer adjustments to the infusion rate (4 vs 6), and avoided inducing hypotension. 21 However, simulated data were used in this study, so it is unclear if the results translate into real-world practice and limit the generalizability of the findings. In another study, physiologic responses (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were predicted after titrations of vasoactive infusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also limited research into the accuracy of predicting physiological responses to vasoactive agents other than nitroglycerin. Görges and colleagues 21 evaluated whether an advisory system that predicts mean arterial pressure 5 minutes in the future enhances a clinician's ability to titrate sodium-nitroprusside infusions. They used published models to simulate the response of 100 individual patients to infusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the oscillation observed in the highly norepinephrine-responsive patients may result in part from the intrinsic time-delay of the system; in this set of simulations drip adjustments were delayed by 12 s of simulated time to represent lag in the infusion line, and an additional 5–10 s for the drug to be ‘circulated’ in the patient model and reach receptor sites. In clinical practice it is obviously impossible to remove these delays between rate changes and effect-site concentration changes, and they may well be longer than 17–22 s. While we have shown the controller is stable with longer delays (up to 60 s) [21], it may be possible to identify the specific delay and patient responsiveness during operation and adjust therapy accordingly [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the previous publication [21], the derived measure of ‘mean MAP over time’ in the data module has been replaced with ‘filtered MAP’. This measure is MAP run through an infinite-impulse response low-pass filter (IIRLPF) using the same methodology as Görges and colleagues in their report of an online system identification methodology [22]. Compared to mean MAP, the IIRLPF value remains robust to noise in the input data, but more rapidly trends change in MAP value compared to a straight time-averaged value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A trend of predicted MAP, based on the vasoactive drug infusion rate, is shown to indicate therapy support of MAP. 20 However, the MAP component was not evaluated in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%