2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1728-869x(10)60006-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two-level Model of Motor Performance Ability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Motor ability refers to “general traits or capacities of an individual, that underlie the performance of a variety of movement skills” . Corresponding to the three‐level model, the German Motor Test measures five basic motor abilities including endurance, speed, strength, coordination, and flexibility . Except for flexibility (which is seen as more anatomically determined), these five motor abilities can be differentiated into more energetically or information‐oriented.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motor ability refers to “general traits or capacities of an individual, that underlie the performance of a variety of movement skills” . Corresponding to the three‐level model, the German Motor Test measures five basic motor abilities including endurance, speed, strength, coordination, and flexibility . Except for flexibility (which is seen as more anatomically determined), these five motor abilities can be differentiated into more energetically or information‐oriented.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each gross motor coordination task we calculated age- and gender-specific z -scores (independently for both survey waves in terms of Hypothesis 1) and combined the standardized scores to a gross motor coordination score. Respective gross motor coordination score covers two dimensions: gross motor coordination under time pressure (jumping side-to-side) as well as under precision pressure (one-leg stand; balancing backwards; e.g., Lämmle et al, 2010) which is represented by an expectable diminished internal consistency ( Cronbach‘s α = 0.62). Following common practice in defining a group with significant motor problems (see Cairney et al, 2013) we calculated the age- and gender-specific 15th Percentile of the respective gross motor coordination score and used this cut-off value to classify each participant as either having (≤15th Percentile) or not having (>15th Percentile) gross motor coordination problems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were tested with eight tests of the “Motorik”-Module (MoMo) test battery [39] to assess a complete PF profile involving endurance (through a bicycle ergometer test), strength (through push-ups, standing long jump, and force plate for high jumps), coordination under precision demands (through standing on one leg and balancing backwards), coordination under time pressure (through jumping sideways), and flexibility (through forward bending of the trunk). The content-related validity of all tests was evaluated as good ( M Significance = 1.9, M Practicability = 1.7) throughout with regard to significance and feasibility as based upon expert ratings.…”
Section: Methods Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%